IR vs. MMM: Ingersoll Rand vs. 3M Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but IR is classified in Machinery while MMM is classified in Industrial Conglomerates.

Company profile comparison for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM)
Profile Item	IR	MMM
Name	Ingersoll Rand Inc.	3M Company
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Machinery	Industrial Conglomerates
GICS Sub-Industry	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components	Industrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization	31.87 billion USD	95.67 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 12, 2017	January 2, 1962
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MMM

GSPC

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	IR	MMM
Total Return (1Y)	12.39%	16.26%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	9.19%	38.64%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	8.02%	8.14%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MMM

GSPC

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	IR	MMM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	34.08%	27.61%
Beta (5Y)	1.12	0.97
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-36.62%	-48.86%
Avg. Volume (3M)	4.27M	3.14M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

IR and MMM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	IR	MMM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.24	0.43
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.37	0.70

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

3M (MMM) at 72.97% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

13.41%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
IR: 13.41%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

72.97%

MMM: 72.97%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% and 3M (MMM) at 14.01% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

17.20%

Max: 27.47%
IR: 17.20%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

14.01%

Max: 27.47%
MMM: 14.01%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% and 3M (MMM) at 23.69% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

18.79%

Max: 36.60%
IR: 18.79%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

23.69%

Max: 36.60%
MMM: 23.69%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	IR	MMM
ROE (TTM)	13.41%	72.97%
ROA (TTM)	4.98%	8.22%
Net Margin (TTM)	17.20%	14.01%
Operating Margin (TTM)	18.79%	23.69%
Gross Margin (TTM)	42.57%	39.53%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while 3M (MMM) at 1.52% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

3M (MMM) at -20.53% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	IR	MMM
Revenue Growth (YoY)	5.75%	1.52%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	8.95%	-1.57%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-29.61%	-20.53%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-0.46%	-16.16%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while 3M (MMM) at 1.41 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MMM.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

1.69

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
IR: 1.69
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

1.41

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
MMM: 1.41
Min: 0.36

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 3.04 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

0.46

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
IR: 0.46
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

3.04

MMM: 3.04
Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	IR	MMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.69	1.41
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.46	3.04
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.76	1.26

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

3M (MMM) at 1.64% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, MMM the richer one.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

0.10%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
IR: 0.10%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

1.64%

Max: 2.66%
MMM: 1.64%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while 3M (MMM) at 45.82% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

2.27%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
IR: 2.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

45.82%

Max: 67.39%
MMM: 45.82%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	IR	MMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.10%	1.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	2.27%	45.82%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 and 3M (MMM) at 27.63 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

23.51

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
IR: 23.51
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

27.63

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
MMM: 27.63
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 and 3M (MMM) at 3.79 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

3.96

Max: 7.54
IR: 3.96
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

3.79

Max: 7.54
MMM: 3.79
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 23.18 prices above its benchmark range — MMM looks rich relative to book.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

3.03

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
IR: 3.03
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

23.18

MMM: 23.18
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	IR	MMM
P/E Ratio (TTM)	23.51	27.63
P/S Ratio (TTM)	3.96	3.79
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	3.03	23.18
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	3.19%	6.66%