Seek Returns

IR vs. MAS: Ingersoll Rand vs. Masco Stock Comparison

How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but IR is classified in Machinery while MAS is classified in Building Products.

Company profile comparison for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS)
Profile ItemIRMAS
NameIngersoll Rand Inc.Masco Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryBuilding Products
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsBuilding Products
Market Capitalization31.87 billion USD15.85 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 12, 2017March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

IR
MAS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS)
MetricIRMAS
Total Return (1Y)12.39%40.92%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)9.19%17.66%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)8.02%7.57%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

IR
MAS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS)
MetricIRMAS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)34.08%36.68%
Beta (5Y)1.121.19
Max Drawdown (5Y)-36.62%-37.95%
Avg. Volume (3M)4.27M2.20M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
IR and MAS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS)
MetricIRMAS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.241.00
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.371.60

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Ingersoll Rand (IR) earns 13.41% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Masco (MAS) has no ROE this period.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

13.41%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
IR
13.41%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

--

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
MAS
--
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): MAS does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; IR is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Masco (MAS) at 12.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

17.20%

Max
27.47%
IR
17.20%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

12.08%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
MAS
12.08%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Masco (MAS) at 17.24%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

18.79%

Max
36.60%
IR
18.79%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

17.24%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
MAS
17.24%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS)
MetricIRMAS
ROE (TTM)13.41%--
ROA (TTM)4.98%15.25%
Net Margin (TTM)17.20%12.08%
Operating Margin (TTM)18.79%17.24%
Gross Margin (TTM)42.57%36.61%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Masco (MAS) at -3.40% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Masco (MAS) at 2.66% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS)
MetricIRMAS
Revenue Growth (YoY)5.75%-3.40%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)8.95%-4.49%
EPS Growth (YoY)-29.61%2.66%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-0.46%2.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 and Masco (MAS) at 1.83 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

1.69

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
IR
1.69
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

1.83

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
MAS
1.83
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Ingersoll Rand (IR) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.46 against its industry range, while Masco (MAS) reports no figure this period.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

0.46

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
IR
0.46
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

--

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
MAS
--
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): MAS does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; IR is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS)
MetricIRMAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.691.83
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.46--
Net Debt / EBITDA1.761.98

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 1.52% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, MAS the richer one.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

0.10%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
IR
0.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

1.52%

Max
2.66%
MAS
1.52%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% and Masco (MAS) at 27.55% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

2.27%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
IR
2.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

27.55%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
MAS
27.55%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS)
MetricIRMAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.10%1.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)2.27%27.55%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 17.84 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MAS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

23.51

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
IR
23.51
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

17.84

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
MAS
17.84
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 2.07 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

3.96

Max
7.54
IR
3.96
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

2.07

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
MAS
2.07
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Masco (MAS) reports a negative P/B ratio of -35.38, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports 3.03, ranking against industry peers normally.

IR

Capital Goods industry group

3.03

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
IR
3.03
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

-35.38

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
MAS
-35.38
Loading chart…
Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Masco (MAS)
MetricIRMAS
P/E Ratio (TTM)23.5117.84
P/S Ratio (TTM)3.962.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)3.03-35.38
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.19%5.15%