IR vs. LII: Ingersoll Rand vs. Lennox Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Lennox (LII) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Lennox (LII) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but IR is classified in Machinery while LII is classified in Building Products.
| Profile Item | IR | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | Lennox International Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Building Products |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Building Products |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 11.70 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | July 29, 1999 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | -27.83% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | -2.32% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | 3.79% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IR | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 41.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.18 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -49.95% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 563.34K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | -0.77 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | -0.96 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 62.82% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
62.82%
- LII
- 62.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% and Lennox (LII) at 13.76% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
13.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- LII
- 13.76%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% and Lennox (LII) at 20.57% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
20.57%
- Max
- 36.60%
- LII
- 20.57%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | LII |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | 62.82% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | 15.93% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | 13.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 20.57% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 32.62% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Lennox (LII) at -2.73% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Lennox (LII) at 1.11% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | -2.73% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | 3.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | 1.11% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | 17.97% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Lennox (LII) at 1.21 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LII.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.21
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LII
- 1.21
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Lennox (LII) at 1.58 uses more debt funding than most peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.58
- Max
- 2.33
- LII
- 1.58
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 1.21 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 1.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 1.73 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 1.53% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LII the richer one.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.53%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LII
- 1.53%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% and Lennox (LII) at 24.68% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
24.68%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- LII
- 24.68%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 1.53% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 24.68% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 15.47 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for LII, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LII
Capital Goods industry group
15.47
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- LII
- 15.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 2.15 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LII
Capital Goods industry group
2.15
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LII
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Lennox (LII) at 8.88 carries an above-peer premium to book — LII is pricier on assets.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LII
Capital Goods industry group
8.88
- Max
- 9.66
- LII
- 8.88
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | LII |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | 15.47 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 2.15 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | 8.88 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 3.14% |