IR vs. LHX: Ingersoll Rand vs. L3Harris Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and L3Harris (LHX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and L3Harris (LHX) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but IR is classified in Machinery while LHX is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | IR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 48.39 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | -5.21% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | 16.68% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | 5.91% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 29.75% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.46 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -38.16% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 1.70M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | -0.32 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | -0.45 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% and L3Harris (LHX) at 10.03% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
10.03%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- LHX
- 10.03%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of L3Harris (LHX) at 8.76%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
8.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LHX
- 8.76%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of L3Harris (LHX) at 14.34%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
14.34%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LHX
- 14.34%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | 10.03% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | 4.56% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | 8.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 14.34% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 25.55% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% and L3Harris (LHX) at 2.53% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
L3Harris (LHX) at 8.39% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | 2.53% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | 8.62% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | 8.39% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | 15.82% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while L3Harris (LHX) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LHX.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LHX
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 and L3Harris (LHX) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- LHX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 1.20 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 1.88 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
L3Harris (LHX) at 1.92% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LHX the richer one.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.92%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LHX
- 1.92%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while L3Harris (LHX) at 46.09% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
46.09%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LHX
- 46.09%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 1.92% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 46.09% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 and L3Harris (LHX) at 24.20 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
24.20
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LHX
- 24.20
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
L3Harris (LHX) at 2.07 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.07
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LHX
- 2.07
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 and L3Harris (LHX) at 2.39 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.39
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- LHX
- 2.39
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | 24.20 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 2.07 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | 2.39 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 7.09% |