Seek Returns logo

IONQ vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IONQ and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIONQJBL
Company NameIonQ, Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization24.45 billion USD22.16 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 4, 2021May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IONQ and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IONQ vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIONQJBL
5-Day Price Return6.75%-4.25%
13-Week Price Return63.08%-6.66%
26-Week Price Return219.57%67.24%
52-Week Price Return719.18%68.87%
Month-to-Date Return20.81%-4.90%
Year-to-Date Return77.88%43.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume36.08M1.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume24.01M1.55M
3-Month Volatility76.72%35.11%
Beta2.671.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IONQ

-67.52%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
27.52%
Median
9.18%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-1.04%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -67.52%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IONQ

-885.21%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
16.15%
Q3
7.95%
Median
4.80%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-0.29%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -885.21%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IONQ

-700.61%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.74%
Median
6.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
1.97%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -700.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIONQJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)-67.52%45.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)-57.89%3.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-885.21%2.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-700.61%3.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.54%8.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

7.76

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.04
Median
1.41
Q1
0.98
Min
0.11

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 7.76 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.85
Median
0.32
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

-23.93

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
76.01
Median
19.47
Q1
5.91
Min
-23.93

IONQ has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.93. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

JBL

4.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIONQJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)7.761.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)7.260.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-23.934.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

IONQ vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IONQ vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.33%
Q3
3.29%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
77.17%
Median
40.90%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIONQJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%5.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

--

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.10
Q3
28.67
Median
19.23
Q1
15.53
Min
9.46

P/E Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

JBL

33.47

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 33.47 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IONQ

422.34

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
5.63
Q3
3.18
Median
1.10
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 422.34, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JBL

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.74 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IONQ

9.68

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
6.87
Median
1.88
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 9.68 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IONQ vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIONQJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--33.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)422.340.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.6814.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--18.76