Seek Returns logo

INTU vs. LLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at INTU and LLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolINTULLY
Company NameIntuit Inc.Eli Lilly and Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyHealth Care
GICS IndustrySoftwarePharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization183.40 billion USD758.15 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 12, 1993June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of INTU and LLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

INTU vs. LLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolINTULLY
5-Day Price Return-3.53%3.16%
13-Week Price Return-14.53%7.47%
26-Week Price Return9.90%7.18%
52-Week Price Return9.19%-5.86%
Month-to-Date Return-3.68%10.84%
Year-to-Date Return4.66%9.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.88M4.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.82M4.20M
3-Month Volatility23.87%45.12%
Beta1.270.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

INTU

20.38%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

INTU’s Return on Equity of 20.38% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LLY

88.36%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

LLY’s Return on Equity of 88.36% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

INTU

20.55%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.55% places INTU in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LLY

25.91%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.91% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

INTU

26.14%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.14% places INTU in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LLY

32.37%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.37% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolINTULLY
Return on Equity (TTM)20.38%88.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.18%16.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.55%25.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.14%32.37%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.57%82.64%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

INTU

1.36

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

INTU’s Current Ratio of 1.36 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LLY

1.28

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

LLY’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

INTU

0.30

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

INTU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LLY

2.18

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18, LLY operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Pharmaceuticals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

INTU

68.14

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

INTU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 68.14 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LLY

20.36

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

LLY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolINTULLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.361.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.310.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.302.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)68.1420.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

INTU vs. LLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

INTU vs. LLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

INTU

0.65%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

INTU’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

LLY

0.63%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

INTU

30.73%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 30.73%, INTU’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

LLY

36.46%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.46% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolINTULLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.65%0.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.73%36.46%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

INTU

47.61

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

INTU’s P/E Ratio of 47.61 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LLY

58.27

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

At 58.27, LLY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

INTU

9.78

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

INTU’s P/S Ratio of 9.78 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LLY

15.10

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 15.10, LLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

INTU

11.11

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

INTU’s P/B Ratio of 11.11 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LLY

40.43

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

At 40.43, LLY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

INTU vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolINTULLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)47.6158.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.7815.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.1140.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.28400.17