Seek Returns

IMO vs. WMB: Imperial Oil vs. Williams Stock Comparison

How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though IMO is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while WMB falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB)
Profile ItemIMOWMB
NameImperial Oil LimitedThe Williams Companies, Inc.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryIntegrated Oil & GasOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization58.92 billion USD80.11 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSE AmericanNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

IMO
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricIMOWMB
Total Return (1Y)35.68%14.81%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)34.62%28.70%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)32.18%23.72%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

IMO
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricIMOWMB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)30.00%26.38%
Beta (5Y)0.580.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-29.72%-23.01%
Avg. Volume (3M)573.33K7.88M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
IMO and WMB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricIMOWMB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.050.40
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.510.56

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 18.31% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.

IMO

Energy industry group

25.24%

Max
53.85%
IMO
25.24%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

WMB

Energy industry group

18.31%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
WMB
18.31%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Williams (WMB) at 24.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

IMO

Energy industry group

10.88%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
IMO
10.88%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

WMB

Energy industry group

24.66%

Max
56.92%
WMB
24.66%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% and Williams (WMB) at 32.69% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

IMO

Energy industry group

21.36%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
IMO
21.36%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

WMB

Energy industry group

32.69%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
WMB
32.69%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricIMOWMB
ROE (TTM)25.24%18.31%
ROA (TTM)10.93%4.59%
Net Margin (TTM)10.88%24.66%
Operating Margin (TTM)21.36%32.69%
Gross Margin (TTM)20.08%63.05%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Williams (WMB) at 13.78% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% and Williams (WMB) at 17.58% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricIMOWMB
Revenue Growth (YoY)-7.42%13.78%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-7.56%2.91%
EPS Growth (YoY)-28.24%17.58%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-17.26%8.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Williams (WMB) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for WMB.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.30

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
IMO
1.30
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

WMB

Energy industry group

0.75

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
WMB
0.75
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 1.58 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

IMO

Energy industry group

0.17

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
IMO
0.17
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

1.58

Max
1.75
WMB
1.58
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricIMOWMB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.300.75
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.171.58
Net Debt / EBITDA0.134.58

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% and Williams (WMB) at 3.23% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

IMO

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
IMO
2.65%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

3.23%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
WMB
3.23%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Williams (WMB) at 81.69% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

IMO

Energy industry group

26.49%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
IMO
26.49%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

81.69%

Max
133.24%
WMB
81.69%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricIMOWMB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.65%3.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.49%81.69%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 25.23 sits in the richer quartile — WMB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

IMO

Energy industry group

13.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
IMO
13.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

WMB

Energy industry group

25.23

Max
39.54
WMB
25.23
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 6.32 clears its benchmark range — WMB looks notably rich on sales.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.06

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
IMO
1.06
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

6.32

WMB
6.32
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Williams (WMB) at 5.11 prices even higher, above its industry range.

IMO

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
4.21
IMO
3.38
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

WMB

Energy industry group

5.11

WMB
5.11
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricIMOWMB
P/E Ratio (TTM)13.7825.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.066.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)3.385.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)9.90%-3.56%