IMO vs. TPL: Imperial Oil vs. Texas Pacific Land Stock Comparison
How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Imperial Oil (IMO) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though IMO is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while TPL falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | IMO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Imperial Oil Limited | Texas Pacific Land Corporation |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 58.92 billion USD | 18.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE American | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IMO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.68% | -14.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 34.62% | 16.13% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 32.18% | 13.42% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IMO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 30.00% | 49.74% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.62 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -29.72% | -52.50% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 573.33K | 380.93K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IMO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.05 | -0.37 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | -0.50 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 37.07% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
25.24%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IMO
- 25.24%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
TPL
Energy industry group
37.07%
- Max
- 53.85%
- TPL
- 37.07%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 60.71% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
IMO
Energy industry group
10.88%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- IMO
- 10.88%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
TPL
Energy industry group
60.71%
- TPL
- 60.71%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 76.20% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% operates around its industry’s norm.
IMO
Energy industry group
21.36%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- IMO
- 21.36%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
TPL
Energy industry group
76.20%
- TPL
- 76.20%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IMO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.24% | 37.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.93% | 26.08% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.88% | 60.71% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 21.36% | 76.20% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.08% | 94.09% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 13.09% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 6.04% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IMO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -7.42% | 13.09% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -7.56% | 6.15% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -28.24% | 6.04% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -17.26% | 2.78% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 5.41 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.30
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- IMO
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
TPL
Energy industry group
5.41
- TPL
- 5.41
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.01 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- IMO
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
0.01
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- TPL
- 0.01
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IMO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.30 | 5.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.13 | -0.44 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.86% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
IMO
Energy industry group
2.65%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- IMO
- 2.65%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
0.86%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- TPL
- 0.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 27.42% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
IMO
Energy industry group
26.49%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- IMO
- 26.49%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
27.42%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- TPL
- 27.42%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IMO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.65% | 0.86% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 26.49% | 27.42% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 32.00 sits in the richer quartile — TPL needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
IMO
Energy industry group
13.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- IMO
- 13.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
TPL
Energy industry group
32.00
- Max
- 39.54
- TPL
- 32.00
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 19.41 clears its benchmark range — TPL looks notably rich on sales.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- IMO
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
19.41
- TPL
- 19.41
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 10.42 prices even higher, above its industry range.
IMO
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 4.21
- IMO
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
TPL
Energy industry group
10.42
- TPL
- 10.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IMO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.78 | 32.00 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.06 | 19.41 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.38 | 10.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 9.90% | 0.43% |