Seek Returns

IMO vs. SLB: Imperial Oil vs. SLB Stock Comparison

How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB) both fall under the Energy industry group, but IMO is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while SLB is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.

Company profile comparison for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB)
Profile ItemIMOSLB
NameImperial Oil LimitedSLB N.V.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
GICS Sub-IndustryIntegrated Oil & GasOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization58.92 billion USD73.68 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSE AmericanNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

IMO
SLB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB)
MetricIMOSLB
Total Return (1Y)35.68%41.53%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)34.62%1.23%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)32.18%10.62%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

IMO
SLB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

SLB (SLB) is heavily traded at around 12.57M shares per day, whereas Imperial Oil (IMO) sees a more moderate 573.33K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk profile metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB)
MetricIMOSLB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)30.00%37.07%
Beta (5Y)0.580.80
Max Drawdown (5Y)-29.72%-46.63%
Avg. Volume (3M)573.33K12.57M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
IMO and SLB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB)
MetricIMOSLB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.051.00
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.511.59

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while SLB (SLB) at 11.66% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.

IMO

Energy industry group

25.24%

Max
53.85%
IMO
25.24%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

SLB

Energy industry group

11.66%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
SLB
11.66%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% and SLB (SLB) at 8.40% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

10.88%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
IMO
10.88%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

SLB

Energy industry group

8.40%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
SLB
8.40%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% and SLB (SLB) at 14.03% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

IMO

Energy industry group

21.36%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
IMO
21.36%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

SLB

Energy industry group

14.03%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
SLB
14.03%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB)
MetricIMOSLB
ROE (TTM)25.24%11.66%
ROA (TTM)10.93%5.72%
Net Margin (TTM)10.88%8.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)21.36%14.03%
Gross Margin (TTM)20.08%16.59%

Growth

Revenue Growth

SLB (SLB) at -1.60% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% and SLB (SLB) at -24.44% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB)
MetricIMOSLB
Revenue Growth (YoY)-7.42%-1.60%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-7.56%8.33%
EPS Growth (YoY)-28.24%-24.44%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-17.26%-0.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 and SLB (SLB) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.30

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
IMO
1.30
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

SLB

Energy industry group

1.39

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
SLB
1.39
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while SLB (SLB) at 0.47 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

IMO

Energy industry group

0.17

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
IMO
0.17
Min
0.00

SLB

Energy industry group

0.47

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
SLB
0.47
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB)
MetricIMOSLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.301.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.170.47
Net Debt / EBITDA0.131.25

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% and SLB (SLB) at 2.36% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

IMO

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
IMO
2.65%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SLB

Energy industry group

2.36%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
SLB
2.36%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while SLB (SLB) at 56.80% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

IMO

Energy industry group

26.49%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
IMO
26.49%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SLB

Energy industry group

56.80%

Max
133.24%
SLB
56.80%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB)
MetricIMOSLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.65%2.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.49%56.80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while SLB (SLB) at 24.23 sits in the richer quartile — SLB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

IMO

Energy industry group

13.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
IMO
13.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

SLB

Energy industry group

24.23

Max
39.54
SLB
24.23
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 and SLB (SLB) at 2.00 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.06

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
IMO
1.06
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

SLB

Energy industry group

2.00

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
SLB
2.00
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 and SLB (SLB) at 2.83 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

IMO

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
4.21
IMO
3.38
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

SLB

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
4.21
SLB
2.83
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and SLB (SLB)
MetricIMOSLB
P/E Ratio (TTM)13.7824.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.062.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)3.382.83
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)9.90%4.18%