Seek Returns

IMO vs. RRC: Imperial Oil vs. Range Resources Stock Comparison

How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though IMO is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while RRC falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.

Company profile comparison for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC)
Profile ItemIMORRC
NameImperial Oil LimitedRange Resources Corporation
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryIntegrated Oil & GasOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization58.92 billion USD11.39 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSE AmericanNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 19, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

IMO
RRC
GSPC
Loading price history…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricIMORRC
Total Return (1Y)35.68%32.08%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)34.62%15.20%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)32.18%16.16%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

IMO
RRC
GSPC
Loading price history…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricIMORRC
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)30.00%36.83%
Beta (5Y)0.580.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-29.72%-37.66%
Avg. Volume (3M)573.33K3.57M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
IMO and RRC are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricIMORRC
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.050.75
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.511.23

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Range Resources (RRC) at 19.64% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.

IMO

Energy industry group

25.24%

Max
53.85%
IMO
25.24%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

RRC

Energy industry group

19.64%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
RRC
19.64%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Range Resources (RRC) at 26.22% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

IMO

Energy industry group

10.88%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
IMO
10.88%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

RRC

Energy industry group

26.22%

Max
56.92%
RRC
26.22%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% and Range Resources (RRC) at 31.45% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

IMO

Energy industry group

21.36%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
IMO
21.36%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

RRC

Energy industry group

31.45%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
RRC
31.45%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricIMORRC
ROE (TTM)25.24%19.64%
ROA (TTM)10.93%10.60%
Net Margin (TTM)10.88%26.22%
Operating Margin (TTM)21.36%31.45%
Gross Margin (TTM)20.08%52.34%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Range Resources (RRC) at 27.32% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Range Resources (RRC) at 151.38% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricIMORRC
Revenue Growth (YoY)-7.42%27.32%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-7.56%-17.55%
EPS Growth (YoY)-28.24%151.38%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-17.26%-16.40%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Range Resources (RRC) at 0.74 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for RRC.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.30

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
IMO
1.30
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

RRC

Energy industry group

0.74

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
RRC
0.74
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 and Range Resources (RRC) at 0.19 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

0.17

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
IMO
0.17
Min
0.00

RRC

Energy industry group

0.19

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
RRC
0.19
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricIMORRC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.300.74
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.170.19
Net Debt / EBITDA0.130.55

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% and Range Resources (RRC) at 0.78% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

IMO

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
IMO
2.65%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RRC

Energy industry group

0.78%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
RRC
0.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% and Range Resources (RRC) at 10.34% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

IMO

Energy industry group

26.49%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
IMO
26.49%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RRC

Energy industry group

10.34%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
RRC
10.34%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricIMORRC
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.65%0.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.49%10.34%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 and Range Resources (RRC) at 12.92 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

13.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
IMO
13.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

RRC

Energy industry group

12.92

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
RRC
12.92
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Range Resources (RRC) at 3.35 sits in the pricier quartile — RRC costs more per dollar of sales.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.06

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
IMO
1.06
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

RRC

Energy industry group

3.35

Max
5.40
RRC
3.35
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Range Resources (RRC) at 2.34 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — IMO is pricier on assets.

IMO

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
4.21
IMO
3.38
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

RRC

Energy industry group

2.34

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
RRC
2.34
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricIMORRC
P/E Ratio (TTM)13.7812.92
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.063.35
P/B Ratio (MRQ)3.382.34
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)9.90%3.61%