IMO vs. PBA: Imperial Oil vs. Pembina Pipeline Stock Comparison
How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Imperial Oil (IMO) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though IMO is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while PBA falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | IMO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Imperial Oil Limited | Pembina Pipeline Corp. |
| Country/Region | Canada | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 58.92 billion USD | 28.08 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE American | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | October 6, 2010 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IMO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.68% | 35.84% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 34.62% | 20.26% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 32.18% | 12.46% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IMO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 30.00% | 20.43% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.59 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -29.72% | -27.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 573.33K | 993.87K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IMO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.05 | 1.54 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 2.32 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 12.10% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.
IMO
Energy industry group
25.24%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IMO
- 25.24%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PBA
Energy industry group
12.10%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- PBA
- 12.10%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 24.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
IMO
Energy industry group
10.88%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- IMO
- 10.88%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PBA
Energy industry group
24.78%
- Max
- 56.92%
- PBA
- 24.78%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 32.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
IMO
Energy industry group
21.36%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- IMO
- 21.36%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PBA
Energy industry group
32.63%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- PBA
- 32.63%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IMO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.24% | 12.10% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.93% | 4.65% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.88% | 24.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 21.36% | 32.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.08% | 38.23% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 5.34% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at -11.33% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IMO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -7.42% | 5.34% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -7.56% | -12.50% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -28.24% | -11.33% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -17.26% | -19.61% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PBA.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.30
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- IMO
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
PBA
Energy industry group
0.75
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- PBA
- 0.75
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.80 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
IMO
Energy industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- IMO
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.00
PBA
Energy industry group
0.80
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- PBA
- 0.80
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IMO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.30 | 0.75 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 0.80 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.13 | 3.74 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 6.13% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PBA the richer one.
IMO
Energy industry group
2.65%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- IMO
- 2.65%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PBA
Energy industry group
6.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- PBA
- 6.13%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 86.79% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
IMO
Energy industry group
26.49%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- IMO
- 26.49%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PBA
Energy industry group
86.79%
- Max
- 133.24%
- PBA
- 86.79%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IMO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.65% | 6.13% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 26.49% | 86.79% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 20.12 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
13.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- IMO
- 13.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
PBA
Energy industry group
20.12
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- PBA
- 20.12
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 3.36 sits in the pricier quartile — PBA costs more per dollar of sales.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- IMO
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
PBA
Energy industry group
3.36
- Max
- 5.40
- PBA
- 3.36
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 2.55 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
IMO
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 4.21
- IMO
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PBA
Energy industry group
2.55
- Max
- 4.21
- PBA
- 2.55
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IMO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.78 | 20.12 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.06 | 3.36 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.38 | 2.55 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 9.90% | 5.53% |