IMO vs. MPC: Imperial Oil vs. Marathon Petroleum Stock Comparison
How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Imperial Oil (IMO) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though IMO is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while MPC falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Profile Item | IMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Imperial Oil Limited | Marathon Petroleum Corp. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 58.92 billion USD | 101.49 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE American | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | June 24, 2011 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.68% | 104.94% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 34.62% | 42.97% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 32.18% | 45.42% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 30.00% | 37.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -29.72% | -44.75% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 573.33K | 2.56M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.05 | 2.68 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 4.10 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 60.46% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% also sits in the top quartile.
IMO
Energy industry group
25.24%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IMO
- 25.24%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
MPC
Energy industry group
60.46%
- MPC
- 60.46%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 8.34% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
10.88%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- IMO
- 10.88%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
MPC
Energy industry group
8.34%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- MPC
- 8.34%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 17.98% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
IMO
Energy industry group
21.36%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- IMO
- 21.36%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
MPC
Energy industry group
17.98%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- MPC
- 17.98%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.24% | 60.46% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.93% | 13.75% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.88% | 8.34% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 21.36% | 17.98% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.08% | 16.20% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at -4.44% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 31.15% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for MPC.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -7.42% | -4.44% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -7.56% | -9.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -28.24% | 31.15% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -17.26% | -22.24% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.45 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.30
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- IMO
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
MPC
Energy industry group
1.45
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- MPC
- 1.45
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.15 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.
IMO
Energy industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- IMO
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.00
MPC
Energy industry group
1.15
- Max
- 1.75
- MPC
- 1.15
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.30 | 1.45 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 1.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.13 | 0.88 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
IMO
Energy industry group
2.65%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- IMO
- 2.65%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MPC
Energy industry group
1.09%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- MPC
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.93% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
IMO
Energy industry group
26.49%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- IMO
- 26.49%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MPC
Energy industry group
7.93%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- MPC
- 7.93%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.65% | 1.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 26.49% | 7.93% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.39 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MPC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
IMO
Energy industry group
13.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- IMO
- 13.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
MPC
Energy industry group
7.39
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- MPC
- 7.39
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 0.58 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 prices around its industry’s middle — MPC costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
IMO
Energy industry group
1.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- IMO
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
MPC
Energy industry group
0.58
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- MPC
- 0.58
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 4.42 prices even higher, above its industry range.
IMO
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 4.21
- IMO
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
MPC
Energy industry group
4.42
- MPC
- 4.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.78 | 7.39 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.06 | 0.58 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.38 | 4.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 9.90% | 16.00% |