Seek Returns

IMO vs. LNG: Imperial Oil vs. Cheniere Energy Stock Comparison

How do Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though IMO is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while LNG falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG)
Profile ItemIMOLNG
NameImperial Oil LimitedCheniere Energy Inc.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryIntegrated Oil & GasOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization58.92 billion USD56.76 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSE AmericanNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980April 4, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

IMO
LNG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG)
MetricIMOLNG
Total Return (1Y)35.68%36.89%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)34.62%19.36%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)32.18%22.59%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

IMO
LNG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG)
MetricIMOLNG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)30.00%31.41%
Beta (5Y)0.580.06
Max Drawdown (5Y)-29.72%-24.87%
Avg. Volume (3M)573.33K2.00M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
IMO and LNG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG)
MetricIMOLNG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.051.04
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.511.54

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

25.24%

Max
53.85%
IMO
25.24%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

LNG

Energy industry group

39.68%

Max
53.85%
LNG
39.68%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

10.88%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
IMO
10.88%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

LNG

Energy industry group

13.40%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
LNG
13.40%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

IMO

Energy industry group

21.36%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
IMO
21.36%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

LNG

Energy industry group

30.82%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
LNG
30.82%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG)
MetricIMOLNG
ROE (TTM)25.24%39.68%
ROA (TTM)10.93%8.61%
Net Margin (TTM)10.88%13.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)21.36%30.82%
Gross Margin (TTM)20.08%34.89%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 69.93% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for LNG.

Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG)
MetricIMOLNG
Revenue Growth (YoY)-7.42%27.21%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-7.56%-15.77%
EPS Growth (YoY)-28.24%69.93%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-17.26%62.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.30

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
IMO
1.30
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

LNG

Energy industry group

0.90

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
LNG
0.90
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.

IMO

Energy industry group

0.17

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
IMO
0.17
Min
0.00

LNG

Energy industry group

2.31

LNG
2.31
Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG)
MetricIMOLNG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.300.90
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.172.31
Net Debt / EBITDA0.133.26

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

IMO

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
IMO
2.65%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LNG

Energy industry group

0.82%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
LNG
0.82%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

IMO

Energy industry group

26.49%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
IMO
26.49%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LNG

Energy industry group

15.80%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
LNG
15.80%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG)
MetricIMOLNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.65%0.82%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.49%15.80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

IMO

Energy industry group

13.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
IMO
13.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

LNG

Energy industry group

19.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
LNG
19.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

IMO

Energy industry group

1.06

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
IMO
1.06
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

LNG

Energy industry group

2.50

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
LNG
2.50
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 prices even higher, above its industry range.

IMO

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
4.21
IMO
3.38
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

LNG

Energy industry group

8.70

LNG
8.70
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Imperial Oil (IMO) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Imperial Oil (IMO) and Cheniere Energy (LNG)
MetricIMOLNG
P/E Ratio (TTM)13.7819.78
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.062.50
P/B Ratio (MRQ)3.388.70
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)9.90%3.17%