IMO vs. LNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 14, 2025

Here’s a clear look at IMO and LNG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	IMO	LNG
Company Name	Imperial Oil Limited	Cheniere Energy, Inc.
Country	Canada	United States
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization	45.57 billion USD	51.81 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE American	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	April 4, 1994
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IMO and LNG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IMO vs. LNG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	IMO	LNG
5-Day Price Return	0.89%	1.70%
13-Week Price Return	15.75%	-0.09%
26-Week Price Return	20.37%	7.12%
52-Week Price Return	17.34%	24.05%
Month-to-Date Return	0.40%	0.32%
Year-to-Date Return	43.02%	9.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.87M	1.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.76M	1.81M
3-Month Volatility	18.19%	24.99%
Beta	1.15	0.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IMO

19.47%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 27.06%
Q3: 16.37%
Median: 10.02%
Q1: 5.32%
Min: -8.98%

In the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, IMO’s Return on Equity of 19.47% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LNG

66.68%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 27.06%
Q3: 16.37%
Median: 10.02%
Q1: 5.32%
Min: -8.98%

LNG’s Return on Equity of 66.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IMO

9.51%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 48.48%
Q3: 21.05%
Median: 9.42%
Q1: 1.67%
Min: -26.95%

IMO’s Net Profit Margin of 9.51% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LNG

21.05%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 48.48%
Q3: 21.05%
Median: 9.42%
Q1: 1.67%
Min: -26.95%

LNG’s Net Profit Margin of 21.05% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IMO

12.03%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 62.28%
Q3: 31.04%
Median: 18.00%
Q1: 5.41%
Min: -32.54%

IMO’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.03% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LNG

37.61%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 62.28%
Q3: 31.04%
Median: 18.00%
Q1: 5.41%
Min: -32.54%

An Operating Profit Margin of 37.61% places LNG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	IMO	LNG
Return on Equity (TTM)	19.47%	66.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)	10.83%	8.79%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.51%	21.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.03%	37.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	22.75%	47.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IMO

1.58

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 2.60
Q3: 1.63
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.30

IMO’s Current Ratio of 1.58 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LNG

0.98

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 2.60
Q3: 1.63
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.30

LNG’s Current Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IMO

0.16

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 2.16
Q3: 1.06
Median: 0.53
Q1: 0.25
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, IMO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.16 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LNG

3.37

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 2.16
Q3: 1.06
Median: 0.53
Q1: 0.25
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.37, LNG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IMO

157.33

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 51.08
Q3: 22.26
Median: 7.32
Q1: 2.72
Min: -19.25

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 157.33, IMO demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LNG

7.46

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 51.08
Q3: 22.26
Median: 7.32
Q1: 2.72
Min: -19.25

LNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	IMO	LNG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.58	0.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.34	0.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.16	3.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	157.33	7.46

Growth

Revenue Growth

IMO vs. LNG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IMO vs. LNG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IMO

2.04%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 12.74%
Q3: 7.02%
Median: 4.37%
Q1: 2.64%
Min: 0.00%

IMO’s Dividend Yield of 2.04% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LNG

0.83%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 12.74%
Q3: 7.02%
Median: 4.37%
Q1: 2.64%
Min: 0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Yield of 0.83% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IMO

27.94%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 188.73%
Q3: 95.12%
Median: 63.48%
Q1: 28.55%
Min: 0.00%

IMO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LNG

11.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 188.73%
Q3: 95.12%
Median: 63.48%
Q1: 28.55%
Min: 0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.25% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	IMO	LNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.04%	0.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	27.94%	11.25%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IMO

13.73

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 34.98
Q3: 21.60
Median: 13.15
Q1: 8.17
Min: 2.22

IMO’s P/E Ratio of 13.73 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LNG

13.53

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 34.98
Q3: 21.60
Median: 13.15
Q1: 8.17
Min: 2.22

LNG’s P/E Ratio of 13.53 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IMO

1.30

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 4.68
Q3: 2.73
Median: 1.36
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.12

IMO’s P/S Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LNG

2.85

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 4.68
Q3: 2.73
Median: 1.36
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.12

LNG’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 is in the upper echelon for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IMO

2.19

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.11
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.91
Min: 0.34

IMO’s P/B Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LNG

8.05

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.11
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.91
Min: 0.34

At 8.05, LNG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IMO vs. LNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	IMO	LNG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	13.73	13.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.30	2.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.19	8.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	14.36	16.45