IHG vs. VIK: InterContinental Hotels vs. Viking Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK) are both classified in the Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines sub-industry within the broader Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) carries decades of public-market history since April 10, 2003, while Viking (VIK) listed on May 1, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the IHG side.

Viking (VIK) trades as ordinary local shares, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK)
Profile Item	IHG	VIK
Name	InterContinental Hotels Group PLC ADR	Viking Holdings Ltd.
Country/Region	United Kingdom	Bermuda
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry Group	Consumer Services	Consumer Services
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
GICS Sub-Industry	Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines	Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines
Market Capitalization	26.05 billion USD	39.07 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	April 10, 2003	May 1, 2024
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

IHG

VIK

GSPC

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK)
Metric	IHG	VIK
Total Return (1Y)	39.88%	49.03%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	37.41%	--
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	22.58%	--

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

IHG

VIK

GSPC

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK)
Metric	IHG	VIK
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	25.00%	41.04%
Beta (5Y)	1.09	1.38
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-32.78%	-35.39%
Avg. Volume (3M)	213.26K	3.95M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

IHG and VIK are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK)
Metric	IHG	VIK
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.42	1.09
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	2.31	1.71

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Viking (VIK) earns 139.62% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; InterContinental Hotels (IHG) has no ROE this period.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%
IHG: --

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

139.62%

VIK: 139.62%
Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): IHG does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; VIK is benchmarked against the Consumer Services industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 13.40% and Viking (VIK) at 19.33% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

13.40%

Max: 25.52%
IHG: 13.40%
Q3: 12.95%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

19.33%

Max: 25.52%
VIK: 19.33%
Q3: 12.95%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their net margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 25.12% and Viking (VIK) at 29.40% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

25.12%

Max: 49.05%
IHG: 25.12%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
Q1: 5.67%
Min: -16.47%

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

29.40%

Max: 49.05%
VIK: 29.40%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
Q1: 5.67%
Min: -16.47%

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their operating margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK)
Metric	IHG	VIK
ROE (TTM)	--	139.62%
ROA (TTM)	15.51%	8.14%
Net Margin (TTM)	13.40%	19.33%
Operating Margin (TTM)	25.12%	29.40%
Gross Margin (TTM)	60.97%	44.28%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Viking (VIK) at 21.89% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 5.40% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for VIK.

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Viking (VIK) reports EPS growth of 613.89%, ranked against its industry; InterContinental Hotels (IHG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK)
Metric	IHG	VIK
Revenue Growth (YoY)	5.40%	21.89%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	10.06%	26.97%
EPS Growth (YoY)	--	613.89%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	33.17%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Viking (VIK) at 0.81 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 0.66 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for IHG.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

0.66

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.72
IHG: 0.66
Min: 0.22

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

0.81

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
VIK: 0.81
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.22

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their current ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Viking (VIK) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 3.75 against its industry range, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) reports no figure this period.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01
IHG: --

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

3.75

Max: 6.12
VIK: 3.75
Q3: 2.93
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): IHG does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; VIK is benchmarked against the Consumer Services industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK)
Metric	IHG	VIK
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.66	0.81
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	--	3.75
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.89	1.15

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Viking (VIK) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile InterContinental Hotels (IHG) reports a yield of 1.08%, ranking against industry peers normally.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

1.08%

Max: 4.10%
Q3: 1.82%
IHG: 1.08%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

0.00%

Max: 4.10%
Q3: 1.82%
VIK: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Viking (VIK) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile InterContinental Hotels (IHG) reports a payout of 39.21%, ranking against industry peers normally.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

39.21%

Max: 89.80%
IHG: 39.21%
Q3: 36.83%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

0.00%

Max: 89.80%
Q3: 36.83%
VIK: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK)
Metric	IHG	VIK
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.08%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	39.21%	0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Viking (VIK) at 29.06 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 37.95 sits in the richer quartile — IHG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

37.95

Max: 71.70
IHG: 37.95
Q3: 37.12
Median: 21.88
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

29.06

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
VIK: 29.06
Median: 21.88
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 4.89 and Viking (VIK) at 5.61 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

4.89

Max: 6.40
IHG: 4.89
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

5.61

Max: 6.40
VIK: 5.61
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) reports a negative P/B ratio of -53.91, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Viking (VIK) reports 24.05, ranking against industry peers normally.

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

-53.91

Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
Median: 2.37
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51
IHG: -53.91

VIK

Consumer Services industry group

24.05

VIK: 24.05
Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
Median: 2.37
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) vs. Viking (VIK): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for InterContinental Hotels (IHG) and Viking (VIK)
Metric	IHG	VIK
P/E Ratio (TTM)	37.95	29.06
P/S Ratio (TTM)	4.89	5.61
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	-53.91	24.05
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	3.51%	1.04%