ICE vs. SCHW: Intercontinental Exchange vs. Charles Schwab Stock Comparison
How do Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though ICE is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while SCHW falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Profile Item | ICE | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | The Charles Schwab Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Financial Exchanges & Data | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 96.27 billion USD | 158.22 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 16, 2005 | September 22, 1987 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ICE | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.71% | -0.80% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 18.62% | 21.35% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 6.59% | 4.31% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ICE | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.87% | 26.01% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 0.74 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -33.97% | -49.70% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.09M | 8.22M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ICE | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.56 | -0.20 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.80 | -0.26 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 21.12% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
14.40%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- ICE
- 14.40%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
21.12%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- SCHW
- 21.12%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 39.33% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
38.14%
- Max
- 62.84%
- ICE
- 38.14%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
39.33%
- Max
- 62.84%
- SCHW
- 39.33%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 52.67% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
52.77%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- ICE
- 52.77%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
52.67%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- SCHW
- 52.67%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ICE | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 14.40% | 21.12% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.28% | 2.16% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 38.14% | 39.33% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 52.77% | 52.67% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 22.01% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 55.52% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for SCHW.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ICE | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.47% | 22.01% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.47% | 4.83% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 20.71% | 55.52% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 30.77% | 9.93% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ICE | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 1.17% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 1.33% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
1.17%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- ICE
- 1.17%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
1.33%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- SCHW
- 1.33%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 27.79% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 21.03% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
27.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- ICE
- 27.79%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
21.03%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- SCHW
- 21.03%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ICE | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.17% | 1.33% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 27.79% | 21.03% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 15.64 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
23.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- ICE
- 23.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
15.64
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- SCHW
- 15.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 5.85 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
8.82
- Max
- 9.23
- ICE
- 8.82
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
5.85
- Max
- 9.23
- SCHW
- 5.85
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 3.08 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
3.22
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- ICE
- 3.22
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
3.08
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- SCHW
- 3.08
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ICE | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.47 | 15.64 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 8.82 | 5.85 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.22 | 3.08 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |