ICE vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 2, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ICE and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	ICE	RKT
Company Name	Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.	Rocket Companies, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	96.01 billion USD	41.35 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 16, 2005	August 6, 2020
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ICE and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ICE vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	RKT
5-Day Price Return	0.26%	-1.07%
13-Week Price Return	-8.17%	36.67%
26-Week Price Return	-4.14%	46.60%
52-Week Price Return	6.22%	2.38%
Month-to-Date Return	-4.60%	9.06%
Year-to-Date Return	13.07%	72.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.49M	24.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.65M	19.44M
3-Month Volatility	13.15%	60.55%
Beta	1.08	2.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ICE

10.79%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 22.24%
Median: 13.52%
Q1: 8.61%
Min: -4.25%

ICE’s Return on Equity of 10.79% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ICE

23.92%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 69.91%
Q3: 37.24%
Median: 24.30%
Q1: 13.06%
Min: -15.18%

ICE’s Net Profit Margin of 23.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ICE

37.42%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 84.86%
Q3: 47.16%
Median: 32.23%
Q1: 18.65%
Min: -21.87%

ICE’s Operating Profit Margin of 37.42% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	RKT
Return on Equity (TTM)	10.79%	-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.14%	0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	23.92%	-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	37.42%	13.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	77.17%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ICE

1.01

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.37
Q3: 1.81
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.56
Min: 0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ICE

0.68

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.52
Q3: 2.79
Median: 0.96
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ICE

5.28

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 107.59
Q3: 48.41
Median: 10.85
Q1: 4.56
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	RKT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.01	0.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.00	0.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.68	2.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.28	2.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

ICE vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ICE vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ICE

1.13%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.02%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 2.55%
Q1: 1.27%
Min: 0.00%

ICE’s Dividend Yield of 1.13% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ICE

35.80%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 199.38%
Q3: 99.28%
Median: 60.67%
Q1: 32.00%
Min: 0.00%

ICE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.80% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	RKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.13%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	35.80%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ICE

31.78

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 51.69
Q3: 29.42
Median: 17.58
Q1: 12.55
Min: 5.59

A P/E Ratio of 31.78 places ICE in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RKT

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ICE

7.60

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.65
Q3: 7.29
Median: 4.53
Q1: 2.26
Min: 0.04

ICE’s P/S Ratio of 7.60 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RKT

8.10

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ICE

3.70

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.83
Q3: 5.12
Median: 2.66
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.37

ICE’s P/B Ratio of 3.70 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ICE vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ICE	RKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	31.78	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.60	8.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.70	3.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	23.40	22.88