ICE vs. OWL: Intercontinental Exchange vs. Blue Owl Capital Stock Comparison
How do Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though ICE is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while OWL falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has more than two decades of public-market history since November 16, 2005, whereas Blue Owl Capital (OWL) listed on December 14, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.
| Profile Item | ICE | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | Blue Owl Capital Inc. Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Financial Exchanges & Data | Asset Management & Custody Banks |
| Market Capitalization | 96.27 billion USD | 15.48 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 16, 2005 | December 14, 2020 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ICE | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.71% | -27.51% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 18.62% | -3.02% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 6.59% | -4.22% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ICE | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.87% | 46.89% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.28 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -33.97% | -67.10% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.09M | 19.50M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ICE | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.56 | -0.68 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.80 | -0.99 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 6.41% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
14.40%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- ICE
- 14.40%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
OWL
Financial Services industry group
6.41%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- OWL
- 6.41%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.08% keeps a bottom-quartile share.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
38.14%
- Max
- 62.84%
- ICE
- 38.14%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
OWL
Financial Services industry group
3.08%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- OWL
- 3.08%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 31.15% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
52.77%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- ICE
- 52.77%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
OWL
Financial Services industry group
31.15%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- OWL
- 31.15%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ICE | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 14.40% | 6.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.28% | 4.69% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 38.14% | 3.08% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 52.77% | 31.15% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 25.04% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ICE | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.47% | 25.04% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.47% | 27.97% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 20.71% | -50.00% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 30.77% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ICE | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 9.66% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 1.17% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, OWL the richer one.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
1.17%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- ICE
- 1.17%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
OWL
Financial Services industry group
9.66%
- Max
- 9.77%
- OWL
- 9.66%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 650.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports 27.79%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
27.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- ICE
- 27.79%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
OWL
Financial Services industry group
650.00%
- OWL
- 650.00%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ICE | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.17% | 9.66% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 27.79% | 650.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 70.14 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for OWL’s trailing earnings.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
23.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- ICE
- 23.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
OWL
Financial Services industry group
70.14
- OWL
- 70.14
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
8.82
- Max
- 9.23
- ICE
- 8.82
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
OWL
Financial Services industry group
5.04
- Max
- 9.23
- OWL
- 5.04
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
3.22
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- ICE
- 3.22
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
OWL
Financial Services industry group
3.54
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- OWL
- 3.54
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ICE | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.47 | 70.14 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 8.82 | 5.04 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.22 | 3.54 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |