ICE vs. KKR: Intercontinental Exchange vs. KKR Stock Comparison
How do Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and KKR (KKR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and KKR (KKR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though ICE is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while KKR falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.
| Profile Item | ICE | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | Korro Bio, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Financial Exchanges & Data | Asset Management & Custody Banks |
| Market Capitalization | 96.27 billion USD | 89.11 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 16, 2005 | July 15, 2010 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ICE | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.71% | -18.61% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 18.62% | 17.09% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 6.59% | 5.12% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ICE | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.87% | 38.71% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.69 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -33.97% | -49.42% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.09M | 4.77M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ICE | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.56 | -0.59 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.80 | -0.81 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% and KKR (KKR) at 7.28% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
14.40%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- ICE
- 14.40%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
7.28%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- KKR
- 7.28%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of KKR (KKR) at 12.20%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
38.14%
- Max
- 62.84%
- ICE
- 38.14%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
12.20%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- KKR
- 12.20%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% and KKR (KKR) at 20.65% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
52.77%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- ICE
- 52.77%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
20.65%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- KKR
- 20.65%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ICE | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 14.40% | 7.28% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.28% | 1.39% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 38.14% | 12.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 52.77% | 20.65% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while KKR (KKR) at -11.24% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while KKR (KKR) at -28.66% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ICE | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.47% | -11.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.47% | 51.12% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 20.71% | -28.66% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 30.77% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services and KKR (KKR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services and KKR (KKR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ICE | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 1.17% and KKR (KKR) at 0.77% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
1.17%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- ICE
- 1.17%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
0.77%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- KKR
- 0.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 27.79% and KKR (KKR) at 23.96% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
27.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- ICE
- 27.79%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
23.96%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- KKR
- 23.96%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ICE | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.17% | 0.77% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 27.79% | 23.96% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while KKR (KKR) at 30.82 sits in the richer quartile — KKR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
23.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- ICE
- 23.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
KKR
Financial Services industry group
30.82
- Max
- 45.85
- KKR
- 30.82
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
KKR (KKR) at 3.45 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 sits in the pricier quartile — ICE costs more per dollar of sales.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
8.82
- Max
- 9.23
- ICE
- 8.82
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
KKR
Financial Services industry group
3.45
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- KKR
- 3.45
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 and KKR (KKR) at 3.04 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ICE
Financial Services industry group
3.22
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- ICE
- 3.22
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
KKR
Financial Services industry group
3.04
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- KKR
- 3.04
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ICE | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.47 | 30.82 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 8.82 | 3.45 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.22 | 3.04 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |