Seek Returns logo

IBM vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IBM and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIBMTSLA
Company NameInternational Business Machines CorporationTesla, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryIT ServicesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization223.03 billion USD1,117.94 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IBM and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IBM vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIBMTSLA
5-Day Price Return-0.77%5.25%
13-Week Price Return-7.33%1.63%
26-Week Price Return-9.42%-3.87%
52-Week Price Return22.18%64.53%
Month-to-Date Return-5.42%12.43%
Year-to-Date Return8.92%-14.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.31M74.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.58M103.51M
3-Month Volatility24.35%56.71%
Beta0.692.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIBMTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)21.99%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.12%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.11%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.77%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.57%17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIBMTSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.912.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.330.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)45.5771.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

IBM vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IBM vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IBM

2.76%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.76%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIBMTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.76%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)75.57%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IBM

38.56

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 38.56 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TSLA

172.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 172.34, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IBM

3.51

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.51 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TSLA

11.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.27, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IBM vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIBMTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.56172.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.5111.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.9613.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.13187.03