HUBB vs. SNA: Hubbell vs. Snap-on Stock Comparison
How do Hubbell (HUBB) and Snap-on (SNA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Hubbell (HUBB) and Snap-on (SNA) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but HUBB is classified in Electrical Equipment while SNA is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | HUBB | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Hubbell Inc. | Snap-on Incorporated |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electrical Components & Equipment | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 22.69 billion USD | 18.94 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 5, 1972 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -2.60% | 12.48% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.51% | 15.36% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.15% | 14.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 32.90% | 19.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 0.73 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -32.65% | -20.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 557.78K | 333.56K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.21 | 0.42 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.28 | 0.63 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Hubbell (HUBB) at 23.43% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Snap-on (SNA) at 17.32% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for HUBB.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
23.43%
- Max
- 40.55%
- HUBB
- 23.43%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
17.32%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- SNA
- 17.32%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Hubbell (HUBB) at 13.78% and Snap-on (SNA) at 19.21% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
13.78%
- Max
- 27.47%
- HUBB
- 13.78%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
19.21%
- Max
- 27.47%
- SNA
- 19.21%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Hubbell (HUBB) at 20.52% and Snap-on (SNA) at 24.88% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
20.52%
- Max
- 36.60%
- HUBB
- 20.52%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
24.88%
- Max
- 36.60%
- SNA
- 24.88%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 23.43% | 17.32% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.53% | 9.70% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.78% | 19.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.52% | 24.88% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 35.02% | 51.87% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Hubbell (HUBB) at 3.84% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Snap-on (SNA) at 0.93% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Hubbell (HUBB) at 15.10% and Snap-on (SNA) at -1.64% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.84% | 0.93% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.71% | 2.11% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 15.10% | -1.64% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 20.60% | 4.49% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.53 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Snap-on (SNA) at 3.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
1.53
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- HUBB
- 1.53
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
3.55
- Max
- 5.22
- SNA
- 3.55
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Snap-on (SNA) at 0.21 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.29 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
1.29
- Max
- 2.33
- HUBB
- 1.29
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
0.21
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- SNA
- 0.21
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.53 | 3.55 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.29 | 0.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.09 | -0.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.36% and Snap-on (SNA) at 2.66% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
1.36%
- Max
- 2.66%
- HUBB
- 1.36%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
2.66%
- SNA
- 2.66%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Hubbell (HUBB) at 33.31% and Snap-on (SNA) at 50.70% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
33.31%
- Max
- 67.39%
- HUBB
- 33.31%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
50.70%
- Max
- 67.39%
- SNA
- 50.70%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.36% | 2.66% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 33.31% | 50.70% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Snap-on (SNA) at 19.08 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Hubbell (HUBB) at 25.19 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for SNA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
25.19
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- HUBB
- 25.19
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
19.08
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- SNA
- 19.08
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Hubbell (HUBB) at 3.44 and Snap-on (SNA) at 3.60 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
3.44
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- HUBB
- 3.44
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
3.60
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- SNA
- 3.60
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Snap-on (SNA) at 3.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Hubbell (HUBB) at 5.53 carries an above-peer premium to book — HUBB is pricier on assets.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
5.53
- Max
- 9.66
- HUBB
- 5.53
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
SNA
Capital Goods industry group
3.11
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- SNA
- 3.11
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 25.19 | 19.08 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.44 | 3.60 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 5.53 | 3.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.44% | 5.77% |