Seek Returns logo

HUBB vs. IR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HUBB and IR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHUBBIR
Company NameHubbell IncorporatedIngersoll Rand Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentMachinery
Market Capitalization21.95 billion USD33.37 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 5, 1972May 12, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HUBB and IR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HUBB vs. IR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHUBBIR
5-Day Price Return-3.15%1.70%
13-Week Price Return-0.44%-3.48%
26-Week Price Return24.81%4.90%
52-Week Price Return-3.44%-16.00%
Month-to-Date Return-4.02%1.61%
Year-to-Date Return-1.41%-7.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.52M3.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.52M3.04M
3-Month Volatility24.46%33.96%
Beta1.001.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HUBB

25.10%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, HUBB’s Return on Equity of 25.10% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IR

5.06%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

IR’s Return on Equity of 5.06% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBB

14.76%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.76% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IR

7.04%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

IR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBB

20.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.20% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IR

15.07%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

IR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.07% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHUBBIR
Return on Equity (TTM)25.10%5.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.00%2.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.76%7.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.20%15.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.80%43.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HUBB

1.30

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

HUBB’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IR

2.29

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

IR’s Current Ratio of 2.29 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HUBB

0.53

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

HUBB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IR

0.47

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

IR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HUBB

14.62

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

HUBB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IR

6.23

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, IR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.23 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHUBBIR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.302.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.761.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.530.47
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.626.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

HUBB vs. IR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HUBB vs. IR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HUBB

1.26%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBB’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IR

0.10%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HUBB

33.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IR

3.95%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.95% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHUBBIR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.26%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.39%3.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HUBB

26.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

HUBB’s P/E Ratio of 26.59 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IR

64.44

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

At 64.44, IR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Machinery industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HUBB

3.92

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

HUBB’s P/S Ratio of 3.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IR

4.54

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

IR’s P/S Ratio of 4.54 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HUBB

6.25

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

HUBB’s P/B Ratio of 6.25 is in the upper tier for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IR

3.33

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

IR’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HUBB vs. IR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHUBBIR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.5964.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.924.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.253.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.1125.73