HUBB vs. IR: Hubbell vs. Ingersoll Rand Stock Comparison
How do Hubbell (HUBB) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Hubbell (HUBB) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but HUBB is classified in Electrical Equipment while IR is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | HUBB | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Hubbell Inc. | Ingersoll Rand Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electrical Components & Equipment | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 22.69 billion USD | 31.87 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 5, 1972 | May 12, 2017 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -2.60% | 12.39% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.51% | 9.19% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.15% | 8.02% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 32.90% | 34.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -32.65% | -36.62% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 557.78K | 4.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.21 | 0.24 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.28 | 0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Hubbell (HUBB) at 23.43% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for HUBB.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
23.43%
- Max
- 40.55%
- HUBB
- 23.43%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Hubbell (HUBB) at 13.78% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
13.78%
- Max
- 27.47%
- HUBB
- 13.78%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Hubbell (HUBB) at 20.52% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
20.52%
- Max
- 36.60%
- HUBB
- 20.52%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | IR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 23.43% | 13.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.53% | 4.98% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.78% | 17.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.52% | 18.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 35.02% | 42.57% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Hubbell (HUBB) at 3.84% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Hubbell (HUBB) at 15.10% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.84% | 5.75% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.71% | 8.95% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 15.10% | -29.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 20.60% | -0.46% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.53 and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
1.53
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- HUBB
- 1.53
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.29 uses more debt funding than most peers.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
1.29
- Max
- 2.33
- HUBB
- 1.29
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.53 | 1.69 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.29 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.09 | 1.76 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.36% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, HUBB the richer one.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
1.36%
- Max
- 2.66%
- HUBB
- 1.36%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Hubbell (HUBB) at 33.31% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
33.31%
- Max
- 67.39%
- HUBB
- 33.31%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.36% | 0.10% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 33.31% | 2.27% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Hubbell (HUBB) at 25.19 and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
25.19
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- HUBB
- 25.19
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Hubbell (HUBB) at 3.44 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
3.44
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- HUBB
- 3.44
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Hubbell (HUBB) at 5.53 carries an above-peer premium to book — HUBB is pricier on assets.
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
5.53
- Max
- 9.66
- HUBB
- 5.53
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HUBB | IR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 25.19 | 23.51 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.44 | 3.96 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 5.53 | 3.03 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.44% | 3.19% |