Seek Returns logo

HRL vs. STZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HRL and STZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHRLSTZ
Company NameHormel Foods CorporationConstellation Brands, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization15.88 billion USD28.86 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HRL and STZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HRL vs. STZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHRLSTZ
5-Day Price Return1.62%-1.34%
13-Week Price Return-1.97%-11.41%
26-Week Price Return1.09%-5.07%
52-Week Price Return-9.64%-32.84%
Month-to-Date Return2.78%-2.01%
Year-to-Date Return-7.97%-25.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.59M1.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.12M1.99M
3-Month Volatility19.20%26.96%
Beta0.310.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HRL

9.37%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

HRL’s Return on Equity of 9.37% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

STZ

-5.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

STZ has a negative Return on Equity of -5.93%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HRL

6.27%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

HRL’s Net Profit Margin of 6.27% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Food Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

STZ

-4.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

STZ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.40%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HRL

8.45%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

HRL’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.45% is around the midpoint for the Food Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

STZ

1.24%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

STZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.24% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHRLSTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)9.37%-5.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.60%-1.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.27%-4.40%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.45%1.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.54%51.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HRL

2.47

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

HRL’s Current Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

STZ

1.07

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

STZ’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Beverages industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HRL

0.36

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

HRL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STZ

1.59

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

STZ’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Beverages industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.59. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HRL

65.06

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

HRL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 65.06 is in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

STZ

0.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

STZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.81 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHRLSTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.471.07
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.120.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.361.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)65.060.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

HRL vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HRL vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HRL

3.92%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

HRL’s Dividend Yield of 3.92% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STZ

2.46%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Yield of 2.46% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HRL

83.50%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

HRL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 83.50% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STZ

32.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.23% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHRLSTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.92%2.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)83.50%32.23%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HRL

21.31

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

HRL’s P/E Ratio of 21.31 is within the middle range for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STZ

--

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

P/E Ratio data for STZ is currently unavailable.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HRL

1.34

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

HRL’s P/S Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STZ

2.94

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

STZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HRL

2.02

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

HRL’s P/B Ratio of 2.02 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

STZ

4.24

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

STZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.24 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HRL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHRLSTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.31--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.342.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.024.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.8914.31