HOOD vs. ICE: Robinhood Markets vs. Intercontinental Exchange Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though HOOD is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while ICE falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has more than two decades of public-market history since November 16, 2005, whereas Robinhood Markets (HOOD) listed on July 29, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.52, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) is closer to market-like at 0.82 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 21.45% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

For every dollar of sales, both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 39.04% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

Both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 48.10% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 51.58% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for HOOD.

Both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 31.41% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports a yield of 1.17%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports a payout of 27.79%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 37.29 sits in the richer quartile — HOOD needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Both look expensive on sales: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 14.34 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 7.29 carries an above-peer premium to book — HOOD is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics