HONA vs. MTZ: Honeywell Aerospace vs. MasTec Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) and MasTec (MTZ) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but HONA is classified in Aerospace & Defense while MTZ is classified in Construction & Engineering.

MasTec (MTZ) has been public since February 21, 1973, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) listed only on June 15, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative beta of -5.78, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. MasTec (MTZ) has a non-negative beta of 1.91.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both HONA and MTZ need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: MasTec (MTZ) earns 14.53% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) has no ROE this period.

Both Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 11.25% and MasTec (MTZ) at 2.80% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 23.69% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of MasTec (MTZ) at 5.64%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 12.68% and MasTec (MTZ) at 16.22% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

MasTec (MTZ) at 146.12% delivers above-range EPS growth, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at -36.80% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while MasTec (MTZ) at 1.39 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MTZ.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: MasTec (MTZ) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.12 against its industry range, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) nor MasTec (MTZ) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) nor MasTec (MTZ) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

MasTec (MTZ) at 28.40 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 43.32 sits in the richer quartile — HONA needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

MasTec (MTZ) at 0.81 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 2.69 prices around its industry’s middle — MTZ costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative P/B ratio of -18.85, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile MasTec (MTZ) reports 3.35, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics