HON vs. IR: Honeywell vs. Ingersoll Rand Stock Comparison
How do Honeywell (HON) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Honeywell (HON) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but HON is classified in Industrial Conglomerates while IR is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Honeywell International Inc. | Ingersoll Rand Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Industrial Conglomerates | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Conglomerates | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 69.74 billion USD | 31.87 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | May 12, 2017 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 14.14% | 12.39% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.90% | 9.19% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 2.32% | 8.02% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.11% | 34.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -25.21% | -36.62% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.82M | 4.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.36 | 0.24 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.52 | 0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 44.39% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
44.39%
- HON
- 44.39%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Honeywell (HON) at 18.68% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
18.68%
- Max
- 27.47%
- HON
- 18.68%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Honeywell (HON) at 16.92%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
16.92%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- HON
- 16.92%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 44.39% | 13.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.13% | 4.98% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 18.68% | 17.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.92% | 18.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 37.21% | 42.57% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Honeywell (HON) at 7.85% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Honeywell (HON) at -8.27% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.85% | 5.75% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 1.82% | 8.95% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -8.27% | -29.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.20% | -0.46% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Honeywell (HON) at 0.96 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for HON.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
0.96
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- HON
- 0.96
- Min
- 0.36
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Honeywell (HON) at 0.76 and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
0.76
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- HON
- 0.76
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.96 | 1.69 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.76 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.23 | 1.76 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays an industry-typical yield; Honeywell (HON) at 3.63% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
3.63%
- HON
- 3.63%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Honeywell (HON) at 38.87% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
38.87%
- Max
- 67.39%
- HON
- 38.87%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.63% | 0.10% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 38.87% | 2.27% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 10.91 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for HON, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
10.91
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- HON
- 10.91
- Min
- 3.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 1.85 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
1.85
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- HON
- 1.85
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Honeywell (HON) at 3.12 and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
3.12
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- HON
- 3.12
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HON | IR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.91 | 23.51 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.85 | 3.96 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.12 | 3.03 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.07% | 3.19% |