HLT vs. SHAK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at HLT and SHAK, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
HLT dominates in value with a market cap of 58.89 billion USD, eclipsing SHAK’s 5.17 billion USD by roughly 11.40×.
With betas of 1.23 for HLT and 1.61 for SHAK, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | HLT | SHAK |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | Shake Shack Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Lodging | Restaurants |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher J. Nassetta | Mr. Robert M. Lynch |
| Price | 247.76 USD | 128.43 USD |
| Market Cap | 58.89 billion USD | 5.17 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.23 | 1.61 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 12, 2013 | January 30, 2015 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of HLT and SHAK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of HLT and SHAK based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- SHAK features a high P/E of 415.13, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to HLT at 37.87, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
- HLT has a negative P/B ratio of -13.58, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). SHAK, with a P/B of 10.89, maintains positive shareholder equity.
| Symbol | HLT | SHAK |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 37.87 | 415.13 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 16.14 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.21 | 4.03 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -13.58 | 10.89 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.75 | 129.42 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 27.48 | 45.35 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.20 | 4.42 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 36.58 | 142.22 |
Dividend Comparison
HLT delivers a 0.24% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas SHAK appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | HLT | SHAK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.24% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of HLT and SHAK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- HLT’s current ratio of 0.57 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while SHAK at 1.91 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- HLT’s quick ratio of 0.57 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas SHAK at 1.88 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- HLT has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.71), an unusual warning sign, while SHAK at 1.74 maintains a conventional debt-to-equity balance.
| Symbol | HLT | SHAK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.57 | 1.91 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.57 | 1.88 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.71 | 1.74 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 4.07 | 7.09 |