HLT vs. LVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at HLT and LVS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
HLT dominates in value with a market cap of 58.89 billion USD, eclipsing LVS’s 29.09 billion USD by roughly 2.02×.
With betas of 1.23 for HLT and 0.98 for LVS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | HLT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Lodging | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher J. Nassetta | Mr. Robert Glen Goldstein |
| Price | 247.76 USD | 41.17 USD |
| Market Cap | 58.89 billion USD | 29.09 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.23 | 0.98 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 12, 2013 | December 15, 2004 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of HLT and LVS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of HLT and LVS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- HLT has a negative P/B ratio of -13.58, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). LVS, with a P/B of 10.86, maintains positive shareholder equity.
| Symbol | HLT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 37.87 | 22.48 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 2.57 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.21 | 2.60 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -13.58 | 10.86 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.75 | 23.52 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 27.48 | 9.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.20 | 3.56 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 36.58 | 32.26 |
Dividend Comparison
LVS stands out with a 2.19% dividend yield—around 803% above HLT’s 0.24%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | HLT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.24% | 2.19% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of HLT and LVS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.57 and 0.59, both HLT and LVS have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both HLT (quick ratio 0.57) and LVS (quick ratio 0.59) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- HLT shows negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.71), while LVS is heavily leveraged (5.13), illustrating two different balance-sheet risks.
| Symbol | HLT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.57 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.57 | 0.59 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.71 | 5.13 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 4.07 | 3.22 |