Seek Returns logo

HIMS vs. JPM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HIMS and JPM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHIMSJPM
Company NameHims & Hers Health, Inc.JPMorgan Chase & Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareFinancials
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesBanks
Market Capitalization9.80 billion USD803.59 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 13, 2019March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HIMS and JPM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HIMS vs. JPM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHIMSJPM
5-Day Price Return-7.96%-0.65%
13-Week Price Return-30.41%10.33%
26-Week Price Return-26.70%5.76%
52-Week Price Return161.96%35.64%
Month-to-Date Return-34.45%-1.35%
Year-to-Date Return79.40%21.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume24.23M6.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume41.88M8.69M
3-Month Volatility102.99%16.78%
Beta2.281.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

JPM

16.16%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, JPM’s Return on Equity of 16.16% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JPM

33.26%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

JPM’s Net Profit Margin of 33.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JPM

41.23%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

JPM’s Operating Profit Margin of 41.23% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHIMSJPM
Return on Equity (TTM)38.17%16.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.98%1.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%33.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.24%41.23%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.20%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

JPM

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

JPM

3.03

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

JPM

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHIMSJPM
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.98--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.30--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.723.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

HIMS vs. JPM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HIMS vs. JPM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JPM

1.94%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

JPM’s Dividend Yield of 1.94% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JPM

27.49%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

JPM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.49% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHIMSJPM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.94%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%27.49%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

50.64

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 50.64 places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

JPM

14.18

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

A P/E Ratio of 14.18 places JPM in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HIMS

4.87

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 4.87, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JPM

2.90

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JPM

2.26

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

At 2.26, JPM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Banks industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HIMS vs. JPM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHIMSJPM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)50.6414.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.872.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.832.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.464.52