Seek Returns logo

HAS vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAS and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHASSW
Company NameHasbro, Inc.Smurfit Westrock Plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryLeisure ProductsContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization10.60 billion USD22.61 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHASSW
5-Day Price Return0.53%3.39%
13-Week Price Return-1.45%-8.34%
26-Week Price Return37.42%1.38%
52-Week Price Return4.25%-6.78%
Month-to-Date Return-0.37%1.71%
Year-to-Date Return35.16%-19.61%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.77M4.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.01M4.02M
3-Month Volatility20.70%32.48%
Beta0.561.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.33%
Q3
18.49%
Median
14.83%
Q1
2.57%
Min
-8.74%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

SW’s Return on Equity of 2.94% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
10.59%
Q3
10.12%
Median
7.76%
Q1
1.39%
Min
-4.77%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
14.69%
Q3
14.18%
Median
12.19%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-8.06%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHASSW
Return on Equity (TTM)-58.96%2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.17%1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.37%1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.06%4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.02%19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
3.41
Median
2.38
Q1
1.76
Min
1.04

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
1.10
Median
0.25
Q1
0.07
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
30.53
Median
16.20
Q1
5.29
Min
-0.46

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHASSW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)13.770.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.342.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.68%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
3.53%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.68%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SW

3.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.39% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
93.27%
Median
76.96%
Q1
47.15%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHASSW
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.68%3.39%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.63%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.88
Q3
36.36
Median
24.51
Q1
18.86
Min
9.55

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

SW

42.93

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

At 42.93, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.50

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.49
Median
1.68
Q1
1.11
Min
0.48

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.50 is in the upper echelon for the Leisure Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SW

0.51

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.51 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.29
Q3
4.74
Median
3.12
Q1
2.19
Min
1.17

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HAS vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHASSW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--42.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.500.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)42.901.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.2443.42