HAS vs. LULU: Hasbro vs. lululemon athletica Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU) both fall under the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group, but HAS is classified in Leisure Products while LULU is classified in Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods.

Company profile comparison for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU)
Profile Item	HAS	LULU
Name	Hasbro, Inc.	lululemon athletica inc.
Country/Region	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry Group	Consumer Durables & Apparel	Consumer Durables & Apparel
GICS Industry	Leisure Products	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
GICS Sub-Industry	Leisure Products	Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization	16.63 billion USD	12.83 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	Nasdaq
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	July 27, 2007
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

HAS

LULU

GSPC

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU)
Metric	HAS	LULU
Total Return (1Y)	64.51%	-32.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	46.50%	-34.79%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	8.70%	-24.85%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

HAS

LULU

GSPC

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU)
Metric	HAS	LULU
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	32.51%	45.85%
Beta (5Y)	0.36	0.81
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-55.05%	-82.03%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.92M	5.00M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

HAS and LULU are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU)
Metric	HAS	LULU
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.85	-0.79
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	3.29	-1.02

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both companies show strong equity returns, but Hasbro (HAS) at 139.78% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; lululemon athletica (LULU) at 30.90% also sits in the top quartile.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

139.78%

HAS: 139.78%
Max: 44.27%
Q3: 22.94%
Median: 12.36%
Q1: 5.76%
Min: -12.76%

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

30.90%

Max: 44.27%
LULU: 30.90%
Q3: 22.94%
Median: 12.36%
Q1: 5.76%
Min: -12.76%

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their ROE against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Hasbro (HAS) at 18.44% and lululemon athletica (LULU) at 12.78% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

18.44%

Max: 19.00%
HAS: 18.44%
Q3: 9.42%
Median: 5.93%
Q1: 2.80%
Min: -7.09%

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

12.78%

Max: 19.00%
LULU: 12.78%
Q3: 9.42%
Median: 5.93%
Q1: 2.80%
Min: -7.09%

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their net margin against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Hasbro (HAS) at 32.43% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while lululemon athletica (LULU) at 13.21% operates around its industry’s norm.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

32.43%

HAS: 32.43%
Max: 28.97%
Q3: 14.34%
Median: 8.77%
Q1: 4.05%
Min: -7.88%

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

13.21%

Max: 28.97%
Q3: 14.34%
LULU: 13.21%
Median: 8.77%
Q1: 4.05%
Min: -7.88%

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their operating margin against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU)
Metric	HAS	LULU
ROE (TTM)	139.78%	30.90%
ROA (TTM)	14.94%	14.40%
Net Margin (TTM)	18.44%	12.78%
Operating Margin (TTM)	32.43%	13.21%
Gross Margin (TTM)	65.35%	54.90%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Hasbro (HAS) at 13.68% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while lululemon athletica (LULU) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for HAS.

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

lululemon athletica (LULU) at -9.43% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Hasbro (HAS) at -183.64% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU)
Metric	HAS	LULU
Revenue Growth (YoY)	13.68%	4.86%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-7.06%	11.03%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-183.64%	-9.43%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	25.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

lululemon athletica (LULU) at 2.19 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Hasbro (HAS) at 1.40 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for HAS.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

1.40

Max: 5.48
Q3: 3.70
Median: 2.10
Q1: 1.64
HAS: 1.40
Min: 0.75

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

2.19

Max: 5.48
Q3: 3.70
LULU: 2.19
Median: 2.10
Q1: 1.64
Min: 0.75

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their current ratio against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

lululemon athletica (LULU) at 0.45 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Hasbro (HAS) at 4.10 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

4.10

HAS: 4.10
Max: 2.46
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.45
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.00

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

0.45

Max: 2.46
Q3: 1.19
LULU: 0.45
Median: 0.45
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.00

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU)
Metric	HAS	LULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.40	2.19
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	4.10	0.45
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.56	0.32

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

lululemon athletica (LULU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Hasbro (HAS) reports a yield of 2.34%, ranking against industry peers normally.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

2.34%

Max: 5.10%
HAS: 2.34%
Q3: 2.20%
Median: 0.77%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

0.00%

Max: 5.10%
Q3: 2.20%
Median: 0.77%
LULU: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

lululemon athletica (LULU) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Hasbro (HAS) reports a payout of 41.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

41.73%

Max: 96.30%
HAS: 41.73%
Q3: 39.57%
Median: 11.11%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

0.00%

Max: 96.30%
Q3: 39.57%
Median: 11.11%
LULU: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU)
Metric	HAS	LULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.34%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	41.73%	0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

lululemon athletica (LULU) at 9.12 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Hasbro (HAS) at 17.72 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for LULU, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

17.72

Max: 40.20
Q3: 25.33
HAS: 17.72
Median: 17.52
Q1: 14.50
Min: 5.29

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

9.12

Max: 40.20
Q3: 25.33
Median: 17.52
Q1: 14.50
LULU: 9.12
Min: 5.29

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

lululemon athletica (LULU) at 1.16 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Hasbro (HAS) at 3.21 sits in the pricier quartile — HAS costs more per dollar of sales.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

3.21

Max: 3.32
HAS: 3.21
Q3: 1.74
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.56
Min: 0.01

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

1.16

Max: 3.32
Q3: 1.74
LULU: 1.16
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.56
Min: 0.01

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

lululemon athletica (LULU) at 2.58 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Hasbro (HAS) at 18.24 prices above its benchmark range — HAS looks rich relative to book.

HAS

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

18.24

HAS: 18.24
Max: 8.35
Q3: 4.28
Median: 2.11
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.49

LULU

Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group

2.58

Max: 8.35
Q3: 4.28
LULU: 2.58
Median: 2.11
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.49

Hasbro (HAS) vs. lululemon athletica (LULU): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Consumer Durables & Apparel industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Hasbro (HAS) and lululemon athletica (LULU)
Metric	HAS	LULU
P/E Ratio (TTM)	17.72	9.12
P/S Ratio (TTM)	3.21	1.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	18.24	2.58
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.84%	8.95%