Seek Returns logo

HAS vs. IP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAS and IP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHASIP
Company NameHasbro, Inc.International Paper Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryLeisure ProductsContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization11.18 billion USD24.82 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and IP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. IP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHASIP
5-Day Price Return-1.07%-1.57%
13-Week Price Return16.88%-6.89%
26-Week Price Return32.27%-15.21%
52-Week Price Return20.14%-1.30%
Month-to-Date Return6.03%0.58%
Year-to-Date Return42.53%-12.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.88M3.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.25M4.33M
3-Month Volatility23.99%35.68%
Beta0.621.12

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHASIP
Return on Equity (TTM)-58.96%-0.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.17%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.37%-0.12%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.06%-0.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.02%28.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHASIP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)13.770.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.341.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. IP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. IP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.50%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.50%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IP

3.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.25% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHASIP
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.50%3.25%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.63%180.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.63

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IP

1.14

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HAS vs. IP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHASIP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.631.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)42.901.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.3849.64