HAL vs. WMB: Halliburton vs. Williams Stock Comparison
How do Halliburton (HAL) and Williams (WMB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Halliburton (HAL) and Williams (WMB) both fall under the Energy industry group, but HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while WMB is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | HAL | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Halliburton Company | The Williams Companies, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 26.34 billion USD | 80.11 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 1, 1972 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.66% | 14.81% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.16% | 28.70% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 7.11% | 23.72% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.27% | 26.38% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.65 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -54.01% | -23.01% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 10.27M | 7.88M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.43 | 0.40 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.64 | 0.56 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% and Williams (WMB) at 18.31% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WMB
Energy industry group
18.31%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- WMB
- 18.31%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Williams (WMB) at 24.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WMB
Energy industry group
24.66%
- Max
- 56.92%
- WMB
- 24.66%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% and Williams (WMB) at 32.69% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WMB
Energy industry group
32.69%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WMB
- 32.69%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.78% | 18.31% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.23% | 4.59% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.90% | 24.66% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.43% | 32.69% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 14.83% | 63.05% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31% and Williams (WMB) at 13.78% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00% and Williams (WMB) at 17.58% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.31% | 13.78% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.01% | 2.91% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -47.00% | 17.58% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.83% | 8.62% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Williams (WMB) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for WMB.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
WMB
Energy industry group
0.75
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- WMB
- 0.75
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Williams (WMB) at 1.58 uses more debt funding than most peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
WMB
Energy industry group
1.58
- Max
- 1.75
- WMB
- 1.58
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.02 | 0.75 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.73 | 1.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.54 | 4.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% and Williams (WMB) at 3.23% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WMB
Energy industry group
3.23%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- WMB
- 3.23%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Williams (WMB) at 81.69% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WMB
Energy industry group
81.69%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WMB
- 81.69%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.13% | 3.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 28.57% | 81.69% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 25.23 sits in the richer quartile — WMB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
WMB
Energy industry group
25.23
- Max
- 39.54
- WMB
- 25.23
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 6.32 clears its benchmark range — WMB looks notably rich on sales.
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
WMB
Energy industry group
6.32
- WMB
- 6.32
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 5.11 prices above its benchmark range — WMB looks rich relative to book.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WMB
Energy industry group
5.11
- WMB
- 5.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.38 | 25.23 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 6.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.37 | 5.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.20% | -3.56% |