Seek Returns logo

HAL vs. TRGP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAL and TRGP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

TRGP’s market capitalization of 37.93 billion USD is significantly greater than HAL’s 17.72 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.14 for HAL and 1.07 for TRGP, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolHALTRGP
Company NameHalliburton CompanyTarga Resources Corp.
CountryUSUS
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Midstream
CEOJeffrey Allen Miller CPAMatthew J. Meloy
Price20.615 USD174.835 USD
Market Cap17.72 billion USD37.93 billion USD
Beta1.141.07
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJune 1, 1972December 7, 2010
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAL and TRGP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAL vs. TRGP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

HAL

20.37%

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
36.08%
Q3
17.97%
Median
11.37%
Q1
5.31%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry, HAL’s Return on Equity of 20.37% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TRGP

51.85%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
27.45%
Q3
19.75%
Median
15.01%
Q1
8.48%
Min
0.13%

TRGP’s Return on Equity of 51.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

HAL

12.52%

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
19.15%
Q3
11.69%
Median
7.62%
Q1
4.60%
Min
-0.55%

In the upper quartile for the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry, HAL’s Return on Invested Capital of 12.52% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

TRGP

10.49%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
20.30%
Q3
12.39%
Median
8.75%
Q1
4.96%
Min
-1.77%

TRGP’s Return on Invested Capital of 10.49% is in line with the norm for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

HAL

9.31%

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
18.33%
Q3
10.80%
Median
6.68%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.48%

HAL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TRGP

7.95%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
48.08%
Q3
33.02%
Median
18.32%
Q1
10.29%
Min
-20.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry, TRGP’s Net Profit Margin of 7.95% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

HAL

14.48%

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
33.39%
Q3
18.22%
Median
10.82%
Q1
6.74%
Min
-3.70%

HAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.48% is around the midpoint for the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRGP

16.16%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
64.83%
Q3
39.12%
Median
32.11%
Q1
12.82%
Min
-13.33%

TRGP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.16% is around the midpoint for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHALTRGP
Return on Equity (TTM)20.37%51.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.34%5.73%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)12.52%10.49%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.31%7.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.48%16.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.17%22.22%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

HAL

1.98

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.45
Q3
2.30
Median
1.89
Q1
1.45
Min
0.98

HAL’s Current Ratio of 1.98 aligns with the median group of the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRGP

0.65

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.11
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

TRGP’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

HAL

0.83

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.71
Q3
0.78
Median
0.42
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

HAL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TRGP

6.61

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.20
Median
1.02
Q1
0.51
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 6.61, TRGP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Oil & Gas Midstream industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

HAL

7.31

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
21.78
Q3
11.52
Median
5.66
Q1
2.95
Min
-0.18

HAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRGP

4.93

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
5.34
Median
4.10
Q1
2.04
Min
-0.53

TRGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHALTRGP
Current Ratio (TTM)1.980.65
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.460.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.836.61
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.340.71
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.573.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.314.93

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for HAL and TRGP. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

EPS Growth

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year EPS (Earnings Per Share) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

HAL

3.30%

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.61%
Q3
2.72%
Median
0.39%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.30%, HAL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TRGP

1.86%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
24.20%
Q3
7.64%
Median
5.85%
Q1
3.72%
Min
0.00%

TRGP’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

HAL

28.39%

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
309.30%
Q3
43.65%
Median
13.73%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HAL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.39% is within the typical range for the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRGP

50.95%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
183.04%
Q3
113.22%
Median
89.17%
Q1
62.10%
Min
0.00%

TRGP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.95% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHALTRGP
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.30%1.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.39%50.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

HAL

8.51

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.34
Q3
20.72
Median
14.00
Q1
9.32
Min
3.96

In the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry, HAL’s P/E Ratio of 8.51 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TRGP

29.14

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
33.49
Q3
20.27
Median
13.12
Q1
10.61
Min
3.06

A P/E Ratio of 29.14 places TRGP in the upper quartile for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

HAL

1.93

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.48
Median
0.87
Q1
0.42
Min
0.04

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

TRGP

2.06

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
5.02
Q3
2.74
Median
2.00
Q1
0.54
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

HAL

0.79

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
1.80
Median
1.14
Q1
0.62
Min
0.44

HAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TRGP

2.31

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.05
Median
2.30
Q1
1.19
Min
0.08

TRGP’s P/S Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

HAL

1.72

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
2.47
Median
1.62
Q1
1.14
Min
0.48

HAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.72 is within the conventional range for the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRGP

15.54

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
4.33
Q3
2.57
Median
1.77
Q1
1.02
Min
0.31

At 15.54, TRGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Equipment & Services and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHALTRGP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)8.5129.14
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.932.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.792.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.7215.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.5759.31
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)5.6713.29
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.093.28