Seek Returns logo

HAL vs. TRGP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAL and TRGP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHALTRGP
Company NameHalliburton CompanyTarga Resources Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization20.73 billion USD34.93 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972December 7, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAL and TRGP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAL vs. TRGP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHALTRGP
5-Day Price Return-2.76%-4.02%
13-Week Price Return12.96%-6.47%
26-Week Price Return-4.18%-19.04%
52-Week Price Return-18.61%5.91%
Month-to-Date Return-1.18%-3.13%
Year-to-Date Return-10.59%-9.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.97M1.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.27M1.59M
3-Month Volatility36.08%24.55%
Beta0.830.93

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAL

17.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

HAL’s Return on Equity of 17.87% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TRGP

64.20%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

TRGP’s Return on Equity of 64.20% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAL

8.37%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

HAL’s Net Profit Margin of 8.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TRGP

9.59%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

TRGP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAL

13.32%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

HAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.32% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRGP

17.60%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

TRGP’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.60% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHALTRGP
Return on Equity (TTM)17.87%64.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.34%7.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.37%9.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.32%17.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)17.06%35.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAL

2.00

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

HAL’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRGP

0.69

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

TRGP’s Current Ratio of 0.69 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAL

0.72

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

HAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TRGP

6.51

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 6.51, TRGP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAL

9.96

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

HAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.96 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRGP

3.56

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

TRGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHALTRGP
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.000.69
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.726.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.963.56

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAL vs. TRGP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAL vs. TRGP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAL

2.84%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

HAL’s Dividend Yield of 2.84% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TRGP

2.05%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

TRGP’s Dividend Yield of 2.05% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAL

31.69%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

HAL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.69% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRGP

43.77%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

TRGP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.77% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHALTRGP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.84%2.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.69%43.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAL

11.16

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, HAL’s P/E Ratio of 11.16 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TRGP

21.37

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

TRGP’s P/E Ratio of 21.37 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAL

0.93

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

HAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TRGP

2.05

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

TRGP’s P/S Ratio of 2.05 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAL

1.67

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

HAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.67 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRGP

14.59

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

At 14.59, TRGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HAL vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHALTRGP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.1621.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.932.05
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.6714.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.6737.74