HAL vs. PR: Halliburton vs. Permian Resources Stock Comparison
How do Halliburton (HAL) and Permian Resources (PR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Halliburton (HAL) and Permian Resources (PR) both fall under the Energy industry group, but HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while PR is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | HAL | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Halliburton Company | Permian Resources Corp Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 26.34 billion USD | 18.24 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 1, 1972 | April 15, 2016 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.66% | 69.18% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.16% | 23.63% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 7.11% | 26.41% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.27% | 34.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.65 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -54.01% | -44.31% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 10.27M | 9.78M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.43 | 1.88 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.64 | 2.73 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% and Permian Resources (PR) at 13.95% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PR
Energy industry group
13.95%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- PR
- 13.95%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Permian Resources (PR) at 25.04% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PR
Energy industry group
25.04%
- Max
- 56.92%
- PR
- 25.04%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% and Permian Resources (PR) at 29.59% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PR
Energy industry group
29.59%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- PR
- 29.59%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.78% | 13.95% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.23% | 7.73% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.90% | 25.04% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.43% | 29.59% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 14.83% | 77.14% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31% and Permian Resources (PR) at 1.29% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00% and Permian Resources (PR) at -11.72% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.31% | 1.29% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.01% | 33.45% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -47.00% | -11.72% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.83% | -7.36% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Permian Resources (PR) at 0.50 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PR.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
PR
Energy industry group
0.50
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- PR
- 0.50
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Permian Resources (PR) at 0.26 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
PR
Energy industry group
0.26
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- PR
- 0.26
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.02 | 0.50 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.73 | 0.26 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.54 | 0.71 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% and Permian Resources (PR) at 2.95% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PR
Energy industry group
2.95%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- PR
- 2.95%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% and Permian Resources (PR) at 32.64% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PR
Energy industry group
32.64%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- PR
- 32.64%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.13% | 2.95% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 28.57% | 32.64% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 and Permian Resources (PR) at 11.27 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
PR
Energy industry group
11.27
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- PR
- 11.27
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Permian Resources (PR) at 2.86 sits in the pricier quartile — PR costs more per dollar of sales.
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
PR
Energy industry group
2.86
- Max
- 5.40
- PR
- 2.86
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 and Permian Resources (PR) at 1.48 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PR
Energy industry group
1.48
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- PR
- 1.48
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HAL | PR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.38 | 11.27 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 2.86 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.37 | 1.48 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.20% | 2.10% |