HAL vs. MPC: Halliburton vs. Marathon Petroleum Stock Comparison
How do Halliburton (HAL) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Halliburton (HAL) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) both fall under the Energy industry group, but HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while MPC is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | HAL | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Halliburton Company | Marathon Petroleum Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 26.34 billion USD | 101.49 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 1, 1972 | June 24, 2011 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HAL | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.66% | 104.94% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.16% | 42.97% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 7.11% | 45.42% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | HAL | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.27% | 37.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.56 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -54.01% | -44.75% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 10.27M | 2.56M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HAL | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.43 | 2.68 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.64 | 4.10 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 60.46% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
MPC
Energy industry group
60.46%
- MPC
- 60.46%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 8.34% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
MPC
Energy industry group
8.34%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- MPC
- 8.34%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 17.98% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
MPC
Energy industry group
17.98%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- MPC
- 17.98%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HAL | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.78% | 60.46% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.23% | 13.75% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.90% | 8.34% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.43% | 17.98% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 14.83% | 16.20% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at -4.44% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 31.15% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for MPC.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HAL | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.31% | -4.44% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.01% | -9.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -47.00% | 31.15% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.83% | -22.24% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.45 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
MPC
Energy industry group
1.45
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- MPC
- 1.45
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.15 uses more debt funding than most peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
MPC
Energy industry group
1.15
- Max
- 1.75
- MPC
- 1.15
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HAL | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.02 | 1.45 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.73 | 1.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.54 | 0.88 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MPC
Energy industry group
1.09%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- MPC
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.93% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MPC
Energy industry group
7.93%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- MPC
- 7.93%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HAL | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.13% | 1.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 28.57% | 7.93% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.39 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MPC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
MPC
Energy industry group
7.39
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- MPC
- 7.39
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 0.58 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 prices around its industry’s middle — MPC costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
MPC
Energy industry group
0.58
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- MPC
- 0.58
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 4.42 prices above its benchmark range — MPC looks rich relative to book.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
MPC
Energy industry group
4.42
- MPC
- 4.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HAL | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.38 | 7.39 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 0.58 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.37 | 4.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.20% | 16.00% |