Seek Returns logo

HAL vs. MPC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAL and MPC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHALMPC
Company NameHalliburton CompanyMarathon Petroleum Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization18.99 billion USD50.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972June 24, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAL and MPC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAL vs. MPC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHALMPC
5-Day Price Return4.41%2.16%
13-Week Price Return11.91%2.19%
26-Week Price Return-16.69%7.61%
52-Week Price Return-28.64%-7.31%
Month-to-Date Return-0.58%-2.57%
Year-to-Date Return-18.09%18.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.25M1.74M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.69M2.35M
3-Month Volatility37.61%23.93%
Beta1.030.90

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAL

17.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

HAL’s Return on Equity of 17.87% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MPC

13.09%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

MPC’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAL

8.37%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

HAL’s Net Profit Margin of 8.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MPC

1.58%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, MPC’s Net Profit Margin of 1.58% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAL

13.32%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

HAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.32% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MPC

3.99%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

MPC’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.99% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHALMPC
Return on Equity (TTM)17.87%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.34%2.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.37%1.58%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.32%3.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)17.06%9.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAL

2.00

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

HAL’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MPC

1.19

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

MPC’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAL

0.72

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

HAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MPC

1.89

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

MPC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.89. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAL

9.96

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

HAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.96 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MPC

8.08

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

MPC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHALMPC
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.001.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.721.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.968.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAL vs. MPC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAL vs. MPC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAL

3.29%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.29%, HAL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MPC

2.26%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

MPC’s Dividend Yield of 2.26% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAL

31.69%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

HAL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.69% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MPC

38.21%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MPC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.21% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHALMPC
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.29%2.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.69%38.21%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAL

9.65

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, HAL’s P/E Ratio of 9.65 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MPC

23.41

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 23.41 places MPC in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAL

0.81

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

HAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MPC

0.37

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, MPC’s P/S Ratio of 0.37 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAL

1.67

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

HAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.67 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MPC

2.77

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

MPC’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HAL vs. MPC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHALMPC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.6523.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.810.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.672.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.3611.43