HAL vs. IMO: Halliburton vs. Imperial Oil Stock Comparison
How do Halliburton (HAL) and Imperial Oil (IMO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Halliburton (HAL) and Imperial Oil (IMO) both fall under the Energy industry group, but HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while IMO is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | HAL | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Halliburton Company | Imperial Oil Limited |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 26.34 billion USD | 58.92 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE American |
| Listing Date | June 1, 1972 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HAL | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.66% | 35.68% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.16% | 34.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 7.11% | 32.18% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Halliburton (HAL) is heavily traded at around 10.27M shares per day, whereas Imperial Oil (IMO) sees a more moderate 573.33K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.
| Metric | HAL | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.27% | 30.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.58 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -54.01% | -29.72% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 10.27M | 573.33K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HAL | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.43 | 1.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.64 | 1.51 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
IMO
Energy industry group
25.24%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IMO
- 25.24%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
IMO
Energy industry group
10.88%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- IMO
- 10.88%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
IMO
Energy industry group
21.36%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- IMO
- 21.36%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HAL | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.78% | 25.24% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.23% | 10.93% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.90% | 10.88% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.43% | 21.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 14.83% | 20.08% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HAL | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.31% | -7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.01% | -7.56% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -47.00% | -28.24% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.83% | -17.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
IMO
Energy industry group
1.30
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- IMO
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
IMO
Energy industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- IMO
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HAL | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.02 | 1.30 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.73 | 0.17 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.54 | 0.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IMO
Energy industry group
2.65%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- IMO
- 2.65%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IMO
Energy industry group
26.49%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- IMO
- 26.49%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HAL | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.13% | 2.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 28.57% | 26.49% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
IMO
Energy industry group
13.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- IMO
- 13.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
IMO
Energy industry group
1.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- IMO
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — IMO is pricier on assets.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
IMO
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 4.21
- IMO
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HAL | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.38 | 13.78 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 1.06 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.37 | 3.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.20% | 9.90% |