GWW vs. VRT: W.W. Grainger vs. Vertiv Stock Comparison
How do W.W. Grainger (GWW) and Vertiv (VRT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
W.W. Grainger (GWW) and Vertiv (VRT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but GWW is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors while VRT is classified in Electrical Equipment.
| Profile Item | GWW | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | W.W. Grainger Inc. | Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Trading Companies & Distributors | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Trading Companies & Distributors | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 67.45 billion USD | 70.41 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | August 2, 2018 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GWW | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 54.07% | 11.12% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 24.16% | 71.14% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 25.95% | 49.38% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Vertiv (VRT) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.15, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas W.W. Grainger (GWW) is closer to market-like at 0.93 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | GWW | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 24.49% | 71.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 2.15 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -24.50% | -69.52% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 250.35K | 5.90M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GWW | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.03 | 0.10 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.31 | 0.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 52.33% and Vertiv (VRT) at 46.57% turn shareholders’ equity into profit at rates above their industry benchmark ranges for ROE. That is a strong capital-efficiency signal, though leverage and the equity base still matter.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
52.33%
- GWW
- 52.33%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
46.57%
- VRT
- 46.57%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 16.00% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 11.17%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
11.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- GWW
- 11.17%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
16.00%
- Max
- 27.47%
- VRT
- 16.00%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 23.77% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 16.14%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
16.14%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- GWW
- 16.14%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
23.77%
- Max
- 36.60%
- VRT
- 23.77%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GWW | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 52.33% | 46.57% |
| ROA (TTM) | 20.34% | 11.94% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.17% | 16.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.14% | 23.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 39.43% | 38.12% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Vertiv (VRT) at 27.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 4.51% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for VRT.
EPS Growth
Vertiv (VRT) at 166.41% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than W.W. Grainger (GWW) at -8.55%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GWW | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.51% | 27.69% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.62% | 21.59% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -8.55% | 166.41% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.60% | 340.11% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Vertiv (VRT) at 1.39 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for VRT.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
2.61
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- GWW
- 2.61
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
1.39
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- VRT
- 1.39
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65 and Vertiv (VRT) at 0.61 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- GWW
- 0.65
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
0.61
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- VRT
- 0.61
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GWW | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.61 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.65 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.69 | -0.11 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65% and Vertiv (VRT) at 0.11% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- GWW
- 0.65%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
0.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- VRT
- 0.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 20.87% and Vertiv (VRT) at 4.67% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
20.87%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- GWW
- 20.87%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
4.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- VRT
- 4.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GWW | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 0.11% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 20.87% | 4.67% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 31.66 and Vertiv (VRT) at 34.18 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- GWW
- 31.66
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
34.18
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- VRT
- 34.18
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 3.48 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Vertiv (VRT) at 5.37 sits in the pricier quartile — VRT costs more per dollar of sales.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
3.48
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- GWW
- 3.48
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
5.37
- Max
- 7.54
- VRT
- 5.37
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 15.56 and Vertiv (VRT) at 12.80 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
15.56
- GWW
- 15.56
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
12.80
- VRT
- 12.80
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GWW | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 31.66 | 34.18 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.48 | 5.37 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 15.56 | 12.80 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.97% | 4.21% |