Seek Returns logo

GWW vs. POOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GWW and POOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGWWPOOL
Company NameW.W. Grainger, Inc.Pool Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsDistributors
Market Capitalization46.26 billion USD11.26 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 13, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GWW and POOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GWW vs. POOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGWWPOOL
5-Day Price Return1.41%-3.31%
13-Week Price Return-7.47%-2.19%
26-Week Price Return-0.64%-3.86%
52-Week Price Return-5.44%-16.89%
Month-to-Date Return1.49%-2.69%
Year-to-Date Return-8.24%-11.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.25M0.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.30M0.58M
3-Month Volatility27.61%31.92%
Beta1.131.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GWW

54.86%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

GWW’s Return on Equity of 54.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

POOL

31.34%

Distributors Industry

Max
35.43%
Q3
27.95%
Median
14.57%
Q1
11.23%
Min
11.19%

In the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

10.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.99% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

POOL

7.79%

Distributors Industry

Max
5.68%
Q3
5.68%
Median
5.36%
Q1
4.87%
Min
4.81%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GWW

15.27%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.27% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

POOL

11.13%

Distributors Industry

Max
11.13%
Q3
7.77%
Median
5.57%
Q1
5.27%
Min
4.95%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.13% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGWWPOOL
Return on Equity (TTM)54.86%31.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)21.63%11.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.99%7.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.27%11.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.25%29.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

2.82

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

GWW’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

POOL

2.52

Distributors Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.66
Median
1.21
Q1
1.15
Min
1.09

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

GWW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

POOL

0.95

Distributors Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
1.00
Median
0.81
Q1
0.52
Min
0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GWW

34.56

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.56, GWW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max
13.15
Q3
10.84
Median
5.59
Q1
4.01
Min
3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGWWPOOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.822.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.530.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.640.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.5612.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

GWW vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GWW vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GWW

0.97%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Yield of 0.97% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

POOL

1.65%

Distributors Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
37.24%
Median
4.28%
Q1
3.20%
Min
1.61%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 1.65% is in the lower quartile for the Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GWW

22.89%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.89% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

POOL

44.67%

Distributors Industry

Max
903.92%
Q3
695.25%
Median
56.97%
Q1
44.33%
Min
26.53%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.67% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGWWPOOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.97%1.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.89%44.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GWW

23.66

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

GWW’s P/E Ratio of 23.66 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

POOL

27.12

Distributors Industry

Max
27.78
Q3
22.45
Median
18.78
Q1
12.95
Min
5.82

A P/E Ratio of 27.12 places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GWW

2.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

GWW’s P/S Ratio of 2.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

POOL

2.11

Distributors Industry

Max
1.07
Q3
1.07
Median
0.94
Q1
0.62
Min
0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 2.11, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GWW

13.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

At 13.60, GWW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

POOL

8.44

Distributors Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
3.46
Median
3.12
Q1
2.75
Min
2.63

At 8.44, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GWW vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGWWPOOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.6627.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.602.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.608.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.1122.96