Seek Returns logo

GS vs. QCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GS and QCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGSQCOM
Company NameThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization235.07 billion USD181.02 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 4, 1999December 13, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GS and QCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GS vs. QCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGSQCOM
5-Day Price Return-0.37%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return11.48%5.28%
26-Week Price Return51.89%20.33%
52-Week Price Return56.99%0.50%
Month-to-Date Return-2.49%0.85%
Year-to-Date Return35.61%9.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.62M6.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.92M7.76M
3-Month Volatility20.42%25.45%
Beta1.381.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GS

12.67%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

GS’s Return on Equity of 12.67% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QCOM

42.85%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s Return on Equity of 42.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GS

12.29%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.29% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

QCOM

26.77%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places QCOM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GS

15.68%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

GS’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.68% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

QCOM

27.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

QCOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 27.54% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGSQCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)12.67%42.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.89%20.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.29%26.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.68%27.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.58%55.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GS

0.30

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

QCOM

3.19

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

QCOM’s Current Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GS

9.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

QCOM

0.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

QCOM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GS

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

QCOM

38.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

QCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGSQCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.303.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.302.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)9.080.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--38.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

GS vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GS vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GS

1.97%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Yield of 1.97% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

QCOM

2.09%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.09%, QCOM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GS

29.94%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.94% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

QCOM

32.79%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QCOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.79% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGSQCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.97%2.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.94%32.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GS

15.19

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

GS’s P/E Ratio of 15.19 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

QCOM

15.66

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, QCOM’s P/E Ratio of 15.66 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GS

1.87

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s P/S Ratio of 1.87 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

QCOM

4.19

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

QCOM’s P/S Ratio of 4.19 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GS

1.75

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

GS’s P/B Ratio of 1.75 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QCOM

6.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

QCOM’s P/B Ratio of 6.35 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GS vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGSQCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.1915.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.874.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.756.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.6015.60