GS vs. PAYP: Goldman Sachs vs. PayPay Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Goldman Sachs (GS) and PayPay (PAYP) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GS is classified in Capital Markets while PAYP is classified in Financial Services.

Goldman Sachs (GS) has been public since May 4, 1999, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while PayPay (PAYP) listed only on March 12, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Goldman Sachs (GS) trades as ordinary local shares, while PayPay (PAYP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both GS and PAYP need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% and PayPay (PAYP) at 18.80% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of PayPay (PAYP) at 15.85%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 38.37% and PayPay (PAYP) at 32.79% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% and PayPay (PAYP) at 25.85% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

PayPay (PAYP) at 230.06% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports a yield of 2.07%, ranking against industry peers normally.

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports a payout of 25.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 and PayPay (PAYP) at 23.30 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

PayPay (PAYP) at 0.02 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 prices around its industry’s middle — PAYP costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while PayPay (PAYP) at 3.75 carries an above-peer premium to book — PAYP is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics