GS vs. OWL: Goldman Sachs vs. Blue Owl Capital Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Goldman Sachs (GS) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though GS is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while OWL falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

Goldman Sachs (GS) has more than two decades of public-market history since May 4, 1999, whereas Blue Owl Capital (OWL) listed on December 14, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 6.41% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.08% keeps a bottom-quartile share.

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 38.37% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 31.15% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 25.04% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 9.66% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, OWL the richer one.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 650.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports 25.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 70.14 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for OWL’s trailing earnings.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 sits in the pricier quartile — OWL costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics