GS vs. NLY: Goldman Sachs vs. Annaly Capital Management Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Goldman Sachs (GS) and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GS is classified in Capital Markets while NLY is classified in Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).

Goldman Sachs (GS) is an ordinary operating company, while Annaly Capital Management (NLY) is a REIT — read its payout ratio and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than comparing them directly to GS’s multiples.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 7.35% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 80.27% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% also retains a top-quartile share.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 107.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Goldman Sachs (GS) at 38.37%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 87.29% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 80.25% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NLY.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% pays an industry-typical yield; Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 15.38% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) reports payout ratio above 100% at 201.39%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports 25.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 13.02 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 10.62 clears its benchmark range — NLY looks notably rich on sales.

On P/B ratio, both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 1.05 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics