GS vs. ICE: Goldman Sachs vs. Intercontinental Exchange Stock Comparison
How do Goldman Sachs (GS) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Goldman Sachs (GS) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though GS is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while ICE falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.
| Profile Item | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Investment Banking & Brokerage | Financial Exchanges & Data |
| Market Capitalization | 249.73 billion USD | 96.27 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 4, 1999 | November 16, 2005 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 17.85% | 18.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 44.69% | 18.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 20.41% | 6.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.28% | 25.87% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 0.82 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -30.90% | -33.97% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.10M | 3.09M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.41 | 0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.59 | 0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
GS
Financial Services industry group
17.71%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- GS
- 17.71%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
14.40%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- ICE
- 14.40%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
GS
Financial Services industry group
31.21%
- Max
- 62.84%
- GS
- 31.21%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
38.14%
- Max
- 62.84%
- ICE
- 38.14%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 38.37% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
GS
Financial Services industry group
38.37%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- GS
- 38.37%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
52.77%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- ICE
- 52.77%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 17.71% | 14.40% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.11% | 2.28% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 31.21% | 38.14% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 38.37% | 52.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.92% | 7.47% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 7.16% | 9.47% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 26.59% | 20.71% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.52% | 30.77% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 1.17% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
GS
Financial Services industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- GS
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
1.17%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- ICE
- 1.17%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 25.88% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 27.79% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
GS
Financial Services industry group
25.88%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- GS
- 25.88%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
27.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- ICE
- 27.79%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.07% | 1.17% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 25.88% | 27.79% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
GS
Financial Services industry group
12.45
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- GS
- 12.45
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
ICE
Financial Services industry group
23.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- ICE
- 23.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 sits in the pricier quartile — ICE costs more per dollar of sales.
GS
Financial Services industry group
3.52
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- GS
- 3.52
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
ICE
Financial Services industry group
8.82
- Max
- 9.23
- ICE
- 8.82
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
GS
Financial Services industry group
2.36
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- GS
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
ICE
Financial Services industry group
3.22
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- ICE
- 3.22
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 12.45 | 23.47 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.52 | 8.82 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 3.22 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |