GS vs. HOOD: Goldman Sachs vs. Robinhood Markets Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Goldman Sachs (GS) and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) are both classified in the Investment Banking & Brokerage sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Goldman Sachs (GS) has more than two decades of public-market history since May 4, 1999, whereas Robinhood Markets (HOOD) listed on July 29, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.52, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Goldman Sachs (GS) is closer to market-like at 1.27 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 21.45% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

For every dollar of sales, both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 39.04% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 38.37% and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 48.10% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 51.58% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for HOOD.

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 31.41% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports a yield of 2.07%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports a payout of 25.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 37.29 sits in the richer quartile — HOOD needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 14.34 clears its benchmark range — HOOD looks notably rich on sales.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 7.29 carries an above-peer premium to book — HOOD is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics