Seek Returns

GS vs. HLI: Goldman Sachs vs. Houlihan Lokey Stock Comparison

How do Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) are both classified in the Investment Banking & Brokerage sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
Profile ItemGSHLI
NameThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryInvestment Banking & BrokerageInvestment Banking & Brokerage
Market Capitalization249.73 billion USD10.13 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 4, 1999August 13, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

GS
HLI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
MetricGSHLI
Total Return (1Y)17.85%-16.23%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)44.69%15.13%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)20.41%6.74%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

GS
HLI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
MetricGSHLI
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.28%31.00%
Beta (5Y)1.270.87
Max Drawdown (5Y)-30.90%-40.30%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.10M816.85K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
GS and HLI are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
MetricGSHLI
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.41-0.66
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.59-0.91

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 17.29% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

GS

Financial Services industry group

17.71%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
GS
17.71%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%

HLI

Financial Services industry group

17.29%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
HLI
17.29%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 15.80%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

GS

Financial Services industry group

31.21%

Max
62.84%
GS
31.21%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%

HLI

Financial Services industry group

15.80%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
HLI
15.80%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 38.37% and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 24.42% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

GS

Financial Services industry group

38.37%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
GS
38.37%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%

HLI

Financial Services industry group

24.42%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
HLI
24.42%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
MetricGSHLI
ROE (TTM)17.71%17.29%
ROA (TTM)1.11%10.38%
Net Margin (TTM)31.21%15.80%
Operating Margin (TTM)38.37%24.42%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 9.55% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 6.87% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
MetricGSHLI
Revenue Growth (YoY)8.92%9.55%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)7.16%13.10%
EPS Growth (YoY)26.59%6.87%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)19.52%16.05%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
MetricGSHLI
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 1.77% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

GS

Financial Services industry group

2.07%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
GS
2.07%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLI

Financial Services industry group

1.77%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
HLI
1.77%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 25.88% and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 43.62% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

GS

Financial Services industry group

25.88%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
GS
25.88%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLI

Financial Services industry group

43.62%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
HLI
43.62%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
MetricGSHLI
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%1.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.88%43.62%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 24.47 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

GS

Financial Services industry group

12.45

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
GS
12.45
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

HLI

Financial Services industry group

24.47

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
HLI
24.47
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 3.96 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

GS

Financial Services industry group

3.52

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
GS
3.52
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55

HLI

Financial Services industry group

3.96

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
HLI
3.96
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 4.39 carries an above-peer premium to book — HLI is pricier on assets.

GS

Financial Services industry group

2.36

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
GS
2.36
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

HLI

Financial Services industry group

4.39

Max
7.79
HLI
4.39
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Houlihan Lokey (HLI): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Goldman Sachs (GS) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
MetricGSHLI
P/E Ratio (TTM)12.4524.47
P/S Ratio (TTM)3.523.96
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.364.39
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----