Seek Returns logo

GOOGL vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GOOGL and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGOOGLUBER
Company NameAlphabet Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesIndustrials
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization2,963.00 billion USD207.04 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 2004May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GOOGL and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GOOGL vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLUBER
5-Day Price Return-0.44%2.76%
13-Week Price Return38.50%2.73%
26-Week Price Return62.30%42.13%
52-Week Price Return50.09%33.10%
Month-to-Date Return0.63%1.34%
Year-to-Date Return29.22%64.59%
10-Day Avg. Volume27.75M14.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume36.84M18.52M
3-Month Volatility26.16%28.35%
Beta1.081.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GOOGL

34.31%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

In the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, GOOGL’s Return on Equity of 34.31% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GOOGL

31.12%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.12% places GOOGL in the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GOOGL

32.68%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

GOOGL’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.68% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)34.31%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.88%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.12%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.68%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

1.90

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

GOOGL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

0.07

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

GOOGL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 is typical for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

16.20

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

GOOGL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.901.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.900.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.070.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.20-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

GOOGL vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GOOGL vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GOOGL

0.33%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GOOGL’s Dividend Yield of 0.33% is consistent with its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

8.54%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GOOGL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.54% is within the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.33%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.54%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

25.66

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

GOOGL’s P/E Ratio of 25.66 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

16.43

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 16.43 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

7.98

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

GOOGL’s P/S Ratio of 7.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.38

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.38, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

5.91

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

GOOGL’s P/B Ratio of 5.91 is within the conventional range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GOOGL vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.6616.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.984.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.918.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.4424.29