GLW vs. NTAP: Corning vs. NetApp Stock Comparison
How do Corning (GLW) and NetApp (NTAP) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Corning (GLW) and NetApp (NTAP) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but GLW is classified in Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components while NTAP is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.
| Profile Item | GLW | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Corning Incorporated | NetApp, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Technology Hardware & Equipment | Technology Hardware & Equipment |
| GICS Industry | Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electronic Components | Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals |
| Market Capitalization | 91.42 billion USD | 33.23 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | November 21, 1995 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GLW | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.36% | 59.65% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 65.24% | 35.23% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 27.74% | 16.66% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GLW | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 76.20% | 48.37% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.25 | 1.55 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -59.47% | -42.61% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 9.07M | 2.39M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GLW | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.41 | 1.14 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.60 | 1.84 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
NetApp (NTAP) at 114.82% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Corning (GLW) at 17.88%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
17.88%
- Max
- 42.47%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- GLW
- 17.88%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
114.82%
- NTAP
- 114.82%
- Max
- 42.47%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Corning (GLW) at 12.13% and NetApp (NTAP) at 19.19% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
12.13%
- Max
- 27.60%
- GLW
- 12.13%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
19.19%
- Max
- 27.60%
- NTAP
- 19.19%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Corning (GLW) at 18.95% and NetApp (NTAP) at 26.67% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
18.95%
- Max
- 36.27%
- GLW
- 18.95%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- Median
- 8.84%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
26.67%
- Max
- 36.27%
- NTAP
- 26.67%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- Median
- 8.84%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GLW | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 17.88% | 114.82% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.80% | 11.66% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.13% | 19.19% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.95% | 26.67% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 36.48% | 70.63% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Corning (GLW) at 19.14% and NetApp (NTAP) at 5.37% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Corning (GLW) at 215.52% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than NetApp (NTAP) at 11.99%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GLW | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 19.14% | 5.37% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.27% | 2.87% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 215.52% | 11.99% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.92% | 3.13% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Corning (GLW) at 1.72 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while NetApp (NTAP) at 1.24 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for NTAP.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.72
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- GLW
- 1.72
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.24
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- Q1
- 1.32
- NTAP
- 1.24
- Min
- 0.17
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Corning (GLW) at 0.64 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while NetApp (NTAP) at 1.69 uses more debt funding than most peers.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.64
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- GLW
- 0.64
- Median
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.69
- Max
- 1.76
- NTAP
- 1.69
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GLW | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.72 | 1.24 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.64 | 1.69 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.49 | -0.50 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Corning (GLW) at 1.08% and NetApp (NTAP) at 1.23% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.08%
- GLW
- 1.08%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.23%
- NTAP
- 1.23%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and GLW more so: NetApp (NTAP) at 29.34% sits above the band, while Corning (GLW) at 45.34% exceeds every peer in its group.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
45.34%
- GLW
- 45.34%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
29.34%
- Max
- 32.27%
- NTAP
- 29.34%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GLW | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.08% | 1.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 45.34% | 29.34% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
NetApp (NTAP) at 23.86 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Corning (GLW) at 42.97 sits in the richer quartile — GLW needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
42.97
- Max
- 69.48
- GLW
- 42.97
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
23.86
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- NTAP
- 23.86
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Corning (GLW) at 5.16 and NetApp (NTAP) at 4.50 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
5.16
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- GLW
- 5.16
- Median
- 2.56
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.50
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- NTAP
- 4.50
- Median
- 2.56
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Corning (GLW) at 7.03 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and NetApp (NTAP) at 22.18 prices even higher, above its industry range.
GLW
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
7.03
- Max
- 10.75
- GLW
- 7.03
- Q3
- 5.52
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
NTAP
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
22.18
- NTAP
- 22.18
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GLW | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 42.97 | 23.86 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.16 | 4.50 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.03 | 22.18 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 0.95% | 3.52% |