GIS vs. STZ: General Mills vs. Constellation Brands Stock Comparison

Company Profile

General Mills (GIS) and Constellation Brands (STZ) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but GIS is classified in Food Products while STZ is classified in Beverages.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative beta of -0.01, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Constellation Brands (STZ) has a non-negative beta of 0.37.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative ROE of -10.50%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Constellation Brands (STZ) reports 24.02%, ranking against industry peers normally.

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative net margin of -4.89%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Constellation Brands (STZ) reports 20.90%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Constellation Brands (STZ) at 33.58% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of General Mills (GIS) at 15.24%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both General Mills (GIS) at -5.45% and Constellation Brands (STZ) at -10.48% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Only one side can be read here: General Mills (GIS) reports EPS growth of -103.90%, ranked against its industry; Constellation Brands (STZ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both General Mills (GIS) at 0.70 and Constellation Brands (STZ) at 1.00 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both General Mills (GIS) at 1.82 and Constellation Brands (STZ) at 1.16 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

General Mills (GIS) at 6.69% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Constellation Brands (STZ) at 2.84% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, GIS the richer one.

Both General Mills (GIS) at 59.41% and Constellation Brands (STZ) at 36.71% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Constellation Brands (STZ) trades at 12.71 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while General Mills (GIS) has no P/E ratio this period.

General Mills (GIS) at 1.04 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Constellation Brands (STZ) at 2.61 sits in the pricier quartile — STZ costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both General Mills (GIS) at 2.55 and Constellation Brands (STZ) at 2.81 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics