GFS vs. UMC: GLOBALFOUNDRIES vs. United Microelectronics Stock Comparison

Company Profile

GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and United Microelectronics (UMC) are both classified in the Semiconductors sub-industry within the broader Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

United Microelectronics (UMC) has more than two decades of public-market history since September 19, 2000, whereas GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) listed on October 28, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) trades as ordinary local shares, while United Microelectronics (UMC) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 1.69% and United Microelectronics (UMC) at 20.37% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

United Microelectronics (UMC) at 31.95% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 2.76%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 12.11% and United Microelectronics (UMC) at 25.09% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 0.61% and United Microelectronics (UMC) at 2.26% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Only one side can be read here: United Microelectronics (UMC) reports EPS growth of -12.57%, ranked against its industry; GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 2.58 and United Microelectronics (UMC) at 3.27 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Both GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 0.14 and United Microelectronics (UMC) at 0.17 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 0.66% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; United Microelectronics (UMC) at 19.43% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and GFS more so: United Microelectronics (UMC) at 37.46% sits above the band, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 68.57% exceeds every peer in its group.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

United Microelectronics (UMC) at 13.07 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 110.34 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

United Microelectronics (UMC) at 0.13 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 3.01 prices around its industry’s middle — UMC costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 1.80 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while United Microelectronics (UMC) at 2.39 is valued near its industry’s middle — GFS is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics