Seek Returns

GFS vs. MPWR: GLOBALFOUNDRIES vs. Monolithic Power Systems Stock Comparison

How do GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) are both classified in the Semiconductors sub-industry within the broader Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) has more than two decades of public-market history since November 19, 2004, whereas GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) listed on October 28, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Company profile comparison for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Profile ItemGFSMPWR
NameGlobalFoundries Inc.Monolithic Power Systems Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupSemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS Sub-IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Capitalization21.53 billion USD58.06 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNasdaq
Listing DateOctober 28, 2021November 19, 2004
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

GFS
MPWR
GSPC
Loading price history…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricGFSMPWR
Total Return (1Y)19.69%42.29%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-7.06%42.13%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-7.38%20.48%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

GFS
MPWR
GSPC
Loading price history…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricGFSMPWR
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)62.43%57.22%
Beta (5Y)1.841.67
Max Drawdown (5Y)-61.53%-51.65%
Avg. Volume (3M)4.75M776.23K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
GFS and MPWR are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricGFSMPWR
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.250.66
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.370.98

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 24.47% sits in the top ROE quartile, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 1.69% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MPWR.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

1.69%

Max
52.82%
Q3
22.26%
Median
10.58%
GFS
1.69%
Q1
1.29%
Min
-16.89%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

24.47%

Max
52.82%
MPWR
24.47%
Q3
22.26%
Median
10.58%
Q1
1.29%
Min
-16.89%
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their ROE against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 2.76% and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 23.89% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

2.76%

Max
63.80%
Q3
28.36%
Median
11.44%
GFS
2.76%
Q1
0.90%
Min
-37.77%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

23.89%

Max
63.80%
Q3
28.36%
MPWR
23.89%
Median
11.44%
Q1
0.90%
Min
-37.77%
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their net margin against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 12.11% and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 29.75% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

12.11%

Max
58.66%
Q3
30.23%
Median
15.91%
GFS
12.11%
Q1
7.54%
Min
-25.74%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

29.75%

Max
58.66%
Q3
30.23%
MPWR
29.75%
Median
15.91%
Q1
7.54%
Min
-25.74%
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their operating margin against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricGFSMPWR
ROE (TTM)1.69%24.47%
ROA (TTM)3.11%15.52%
Net Margin (TTM)2.76%23.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)12.11%29.75%
Gross Margin (TTM)28.47%55.26%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 26.43% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 0.61% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for MPWR.

Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) reports EPS growth of -64.85%, ranked against its industry; GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricGFSMPWR
Revenue Growth (YoY)0.61%26.43%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-5.74%15.86%
EPS Growth (YoY)---64.85%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-15.34%12.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 2.58 and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 3.70 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

2.58

Max
10.33
Q3
5.62
Median
3.33
GFS
2.58
Q1
2.35
Min
1.03

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

3.70

Max
10.33
Q3
5.62
MPWR
3.70
Median
3.33
Q1
2.35
Min
1.03
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their current ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 0.14 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.14

Max
1.46
Q3
0.65
Median
0.27
GFS
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.01

Max
1.46
Q3
0.65
Median
0.27
Q1
0.04
MPWR
0.01
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricGFSMPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.583.70
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.140.01
Net Debt / EBITDA-0.27-0.92

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 0.66% and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 0.67% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.66%

Max
1.37%
GFS
0.66%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.67%

Max
1.37%
MPWR
0.67%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and GFS more so: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 41.65% sits above the band, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 68.57% exceeds every peer in its group.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

68.57%

GFS
68.57%
Max
49.64%
Q3
21.71%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

41.65%

Max
49.64%
MPWR
41.65%
Q3
21.71%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricGFSMPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)68.57%41.65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 65.27 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 110.34 sits in the richer quartile — GFS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

110.34

GFS
110.34
Max
110.34
Q3
66.81
Median
37.02
Q1
23.96
Min
8.12

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

65.27

Max
110.34
Q3
66.81
MPWR
65.27
Median
37.02
Q1
23.96
Min
8.12
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 3.01 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 15.53 sits in the pricier quartile — MPWR costs more per dollar of sales.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

3.01

Max
21.42
Q3
12.27
Median
5.76
GFS
3.01
Q1
2.73
Min
0.00

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

15.53

Max
21.42
MPWR
15.53
Q3
12.27
Median
5.76
Q1
2.73
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) at 1.80 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 15.56 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.

GFS

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

1.80

Max
14.06
Q3
7.44
Median
4.29
Q1
2.30
GFS
1.80
Min
0.20

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

15.56

MPWR
15.56
Max
14.06
Q3
7.44
Median
4.29
Q1
2.30
Min
0.20
Loading chart…
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GFS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricGFSMPWR
P/E Ratio (TTM)110.3465.27
P/S Ratio (TTM)3.0115.53
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.8015.56
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.04%0.87%